State Employment Law Update: June 2020

Use Code: CVD19 for 14 Days Free

Federal & State Employment Law Updates: June 2020

Seventeen states have updated their employment laws so far this month, alongside eight Federal Employment Law Updates.  Our HR Advisors are versed and ready to answer all your HR questions and help your company through working remotely, coming back to work and all year long.

June 2020 States Law Updates

Labor Law Updates for June 2020

1

DOL and Pandemic’s Effects on Employees and the Workplace

On June 26, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor released the following two Field Assistance Bulletins (FAB) to clarify issues relevant to the pandemic’s effects on employees and the workplace.

  • FAB 2020-3: Schools that are physically closed in response to COVID-19 are in session under federal child labor laws for minors under 16 who are working in agricultural and nonagricultural employment. Generally, school is in session if the local, public school district requires its students to participate in virtual or distance learning, even if they are physically closed. Conversely, a physically closed school is not in session if virtual or distance learning is not required.
  • FAB 2020-4: An employee may take Family First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) leave if they are unable to work or telework because they need to care for their child whose place of care is closed because of COVID-19. A place of care is a physical location in which care is provided for the employee’s child while the employee works and includes summer camps and summer enrichment programs.

See all FABs

2

Form I-9 Examples for Temporary COVID-19 Policies

On June 16, 2020, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services updated its webpage with the following Form I-9 examples related to temporary COVID-19 policies:

  • How to notate remote inspections and subsequent physical inspections.
  • How to notate extended List B documents.

These examples demonstrate how the Department of Homeland Security recommends that employers notate Form I-9 when remotely inspecting employment authorization and identity documents and then subsequently performing the required physical inspection once their normal operations resume. Employers are not required to update their Forms I-9 based on these examples if there are differences.

3

COVID-19 and Immigration Suspensions

On June 22, 2020, President Trump continued and expanded limitations on immigration during COVID-19 by signing a Proclamation Suspending Entry of Immigrants and Nonimmigrants Who Present a Risk to the U.S. Labor Market Following the Coronavirus Outbreak. This is an extension of Proclamation No. 10014, Proclamation Suspending Entry of Immigrants Who Present a Risk to the U.S. Labor Market During the Economic Recovery Following the COVID-19 Outbreak, which was originally enacted on April 22, 2020.

Accordingly, entry to the U.S. pursuant to any of the following nonimmigrant visas is prohibited:

  • H-1B visa;
  • H-2B visa (unrelated to temporary labor or services essential to the U.S. food supply chain);
  • J visas (except for interns, trainees, teachers, camp counselors, au pairs, or in connection with a summer work travel program);
  • L visas.

These proclamations include additional suspension and entry limitations (see each proclamation for the specifications) and do not apply to U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, or valid immigrant visa holders. Additionally, they provide exceptions for the following:

  • Certain healthcare professionals critical to COVID-19;
  • Those seeking U.S. entry under an EB-5 investor visa;
  • U.S. citizens’ spouses and children (categories IR2, CR2, IR3, IH3, IR4, IH4);
  • U.S. Armed Forces members and their spouses and children;
  • Those seeking to enter the U.S. under an Afghan and Iraqi Special Immigrant Visa (SQ or SI-SIV).
  • Those seeking to provide temporary labor services essential the United States food supply chain; and
  • Those whose entry would be in the national interest as determined by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, or their respective designees. 

Routine visas services also continue to be suspended at U.S. posts worldwide as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, but embassies and consulates may continue to provide emergency and mission-critical visa services. Mission-critical immigrant visa categories include applicants who may be eligible for an exception under these presidential proclamations, such as: IR/CR1, IR/CR2, IR/IH-3, IR/IH-4, SQ, SI, certain medical professionals, and those providing temporary labor or services essential to U.S. food supply chain, as well as cases involving an applicant who may age out of their visa category.  

The extended proclamation took effect June 24, 2020 and expires December 31, 2020.

4

COVID-19 and Taxpayer Relief for Retirement Plan Distributions or Loans

On June 19, 2020, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released guidance for COVID-19-related distributions and loans from retirement plans under the CARES ACT. Under the CARES Act, qualified individuals may treat as COVID-19-related distributions up to $100,000 from their eligible retirement plans (including IRAs) between January 1 and December 30, 2020. A COVID-19-related distribution is:

  • Not subject to the 10 percent additional tax that otherwise generally applies to distributions made before an individual reaches age 59 ½;
  • Can be included in income in equal installments over a three-year period; and
  • Individuals have three years to repay this distribution to a plan or IRA and undo its tax consequences.

 

The CARES Act also allows plans to suspend loan repayments that are due from March 27 through December 31, 2020, and the dollar limit on loans made between March 27 and September 22, 2020, is increased from $50,000 to $100,000.

As authorized under the CARES Act, the IRS guidance expands the definition of qualified individuals to anyone who:

  • Is diagnosed, or whose spouse or dependent is diagnosed, with COVID-19 by a test approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (including a test authorized under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act); or
  • Experiences adverse financial consequences because they, their spouse, or a member of their household is:
    • Quarantined, furloughed or laid off, or their work hours were reduced due to COVID-19;
    • Unable to work because of a lack of childcare due to COVID-19;
    • Closing or reducing the hours of their owned/operated business due to COVID-19;
    • Experiencing a reduction in pay or self-employment income due to COVID-19; or
    • Experiencing a job offer rescission or delay in start date due to COVID-19.

 

Employers can choose whether to implement these COVID-19-related distribution and loan rules, and qualified individuals can claim the tax benefits of COVID-19-related distribution rules even if plan provisions are not changed. Administrators may rely on an individual’s certification that they are qualified individual (and who provides a sample certification), but an individual must also actually be a qualified individual in order to obtain favorable tax treatment. Employers have a safe harbor procedure for implementing the suspension of loan repayments otherwise due through the end of 2020, but there may be other reasonable ways to administer these rules.

Read the guidance and more on the IRS Coronavirus Tax Relief pages.

5

Supreme Court Upholds DACA

On June 18, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled, in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedures Act. The ruling states:

“In the summer of 2012, DHS announced an immigration program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. That program allows certain unauthorized aliens who entered the United States as children to apply for a two-year forbearance of removal. Those granted such relief are also eligible for work authorization and various federal benefits. Some 700,000 aliens have availed themselves of this opportunity.

Five years later, the Attorney General advised DHS to rescind DACA, based on his conclusion that it was unlawful. The Department’s Acting Secretary issued a memorandum terminating the program on that basis. The termination was challenged by affected individuals and third parties who alleged, among other things, that the Acting Secretary had violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by failing to adequately address important factors bearing on her decision. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the Acting Secretary did violate the APA, and that the rescission must be vacated.”

SCOTUS’s decision was not a final resolution on the DACA program, but instead addressed the current Presidential administration’s attempt to terminate it without adequate justification. Subsequent to this holding, DACA and its protections, will remain in place pending any future legal action.

Read the ruling and archived material about DACA

6

SCOTUS Rules Federal Law Prohibits Employment Discrimination Against LGBTQ+ Employees

On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled in a landmark case, Bostock v. Clayton County, that an employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII).

Under Title VII, it is unlawful for an employer to discriminate against any individual in any employment-related benefit, term, or condition (hiring, firing, promotion, etc.) because of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. In this case, the court discussed that an employer violates Title VII when it intentionally fires (or refuses to hire) an individual based in part on sex. It is irrelevant if other factors, aside from the individual’s sex, contributed to the employer’s decision. This is because it is a Title VII violation if an employer intentionally relies in part on an individual employee’s sex when deciding to discharge them. In Bostock, the court held that because discrimination on the basis of homosexuality or transgender status requires an employer to intentionally treat individuals differently because of their sex, an employer who intentionally penalizes an individual for being homosexual or transgender also violates Title VII.

The court also clarified that:

  • It is irrelevant what an employer might call its discriminatory practice, how others might label it, or what else might motivate it. When an employer fires an employee for being homosexual or transgender, it necessarily intentionally discriminates against that individual in part because of sex. 
  • An individual’s sex does not need to be the sole or primary cause of the employer’s adverse action. It is of no significance if another factor, such as an individual’s attraction to the same sex or presentation as a different sex from the one assigned at birth, might also be at work, or even play a more important role in the employer’s decision.
  • Employers cannot escape liability by demonstrating it treats males and females comparably as group. An employer who intentionally fires an individual homosexual or transgender employee in part because of their sex violates the law even if the employer is willing to subject all male and female homosexual or transgender employees to the same rule.

The court clearly stated, “In Title VII, Congress adopted broad language making it illegal for an employer to rely on an employee’s sex when deciding to fire that employee. We do not hesitate to recognize today a necessary consequence of that legislative choice: An employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender defies the law.”

This ruling takes immediate effect.

Read the ruling

7

Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act

On June 5, 2020, President Trump signed legislation (H.R. 7010) enacting the Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act (PPPFA), which amends the CARES Act’s Payroll Protection Program (PPP). Some of the key amendments are:

  • The covered period during which borrowers must spend PPP funds was expanded to 24 weeks (from eight weeks), or by December 31, 2020, whichever is earlier. This is effective immediately and applicable to all loans as if the language were part of the original CARES Act. However, borrowers may choose to retain the eight-week covered period if they received their PPP loans prior to June 4, 2020.
  • The date when workers must be rehired was extended to December 31, 2020 (originally June 30, 2020).
  • Rehiring requirements were relaxed through a new loan forgiveness exemption based on employee availability from February 15 – December 31, 2020. During this time, loan forgiveness will be determined without regard to a proportional reduction in the number of full-time equivalent employees if the borrower can document in good faith that:
    • They were unable to rehire former employees on February 15, 2020 and are unable to hire similarly qualified employees for unfilled positions by December 31, 2020; or
    • They are unable to return to their pre-COVID-19 level of business activity (prior to February 15, 2020) because of federal safety and health requirements (issued from March 1 – December 31, 2020) for sanitation, social distancing, or any other worker or customer COVID-19-related safety requirement.
  • Businesses now have five years to repay a loan and the first payment will be deferred for six months after a forgiveness determination. This is only applicable to loans made on or after June 5, 2020.
  • Borrowers must now spend 60 percent of the loan on payroll (the prior allocation was 75 percent payroll and 25 for other expenses).
  • Employers may delay paying Social Security payroll taxes through December 31, 2020. This is effective immediately and applicable to all loans as if the language were part of the original CARES Act.

The Small Business Association and Treasury Department are expected to release detailed guidance on the PPPFA and more.

Read US H.R. 7010.

8

Mental Health and Stress Resources

In response to the COVID-19 outbreak and subsequent fallout, the following federal resources are available to share with your employees:

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Coping with Stress page provides information about handling the stress of an outbreak, reactions, caring for yourself and your community, who is at a higher risk, and coming out of quarantine.
  • The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) offers the following resources:
    • COVID-19 Behavioral Health Resources lists a collection of resources created by federal agencies and their partners to help healthcare providers, caregivers, and the general population prepare for and manage the negative behavioral effects that can accompany a public health emergency.
    • Mental Health and Coping links to resources and advice to help individuals cope and to support their mental and behavioral health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many of these resources are available in multiple languages.
  • The HHS Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) COVID-19 resources page links to resources to help individuals, providers, communities, and states across the country deal with mental health challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) COVID-19 Partner Toolkit links to CMS and HHS materials on COVID-19. 
  • The National Council for Behavioral Health’s Resources for COVID-19 provides links to resources for managing mental health during COVID-19 as well as tax, loan, and leave information for employers and employees.
  • The National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors COVID-19 Resource Links page provides federal government COVID-19 compliance resource links, state health department links, and more.

Individual State Labor Laws

State Specific Labor Law Updates

Compliance can weigh down even the most experienced professionals. Our HR Advisors, automatically updating Handbook, Compliance Database, HR Tools and Employee Training are ready to help navigate HR all year long. Everything included with your AllMyHR™ Solutions

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

Previous Labor Laws & Information

Employment Law Updates: April 2020

Federal & State Employment Law Updates: April 2020

Fourteen States have updated their employment laws so far this month, alongside nine Federal Law Updates.  Our HR Advisors are versed and ready to answer your toughest HR questions to help your company through working remotely, coming back to work and all year long.

Employment Law Updates April 2020

Labor Law Updates for April 2020

1

COVID-19, Commercial Drivers, and Hours of Service Temporary Suspension

An emergency declaration regarding suspensions of regulations for permissible drive times for commercial drivers. 

On March 13, 2020, the federal Department of Transportation (DOT) released an emergency declaration (No. 2020-002), with an extension on April 8, 2020, in response to national emergency conditions caused by COVID-19 that create an immediate need for transportation of essential supplies, equipment, and persons. It also provides necessary relief from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for motor carriers and drivers engaged in the transport of these essential supplies, equipment, and persons.

Under the declaration, the DOT’s hours of service requirements that regulate permissible drive time are temporarily suspended for commercial motor vehicle operations that provide direct assistance in support of emergency relief efforts related to the COVID-19 outbreaks, including transportation to meet immediate needs for:

  1. Medical supplies and equipment related to the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of COVID-19;
  2. Supplies and equipment necessary for community safety, sanitation, and prevention of community transmission of COVID-19 such as masks, gloves, hand sanitizer, soap, and disinfectants;
  3. Food, paper products, and other groceries for emergency restocking of distribution centers or stores;
  4. Immediate precursor raw materials — such as paper, plastic, or alcohol — that are required and to be used for the manufacture of items in bullets 1, 2, 3, or 5;
  5. Liquefied gases to be used in refrigeration or cooling systems;
  6. Equipment, supplies, and persons necessary to establish and manage temporary housing, quarantine, and isolation facilities related to COVID-19;
  7. Persons designated by federal, state, or local authorities for medical, isolation, or quarantine purposes; and
  8. Persons necessary to provide other medical or emergency services, the supply of which may be affected by the COVID-19 response.

Direct assistance does not include routine commercial deliveries, including mixed loads with a nominal quantity of qualifying emergency relief added to obtain the benefits of this emergency declaration.

Direct assistance terminates when a driver or commercial motor vehicle is used in interstate commerce to transport cargo or provide services that are not in support of COVID-19 emergency relief efforts or when the motor carrier dispatches a driver or commercial motor vehicle to another location to begin operations in commerce. Upon termination of direct assistance, the motor carrier and driver are subject to the standard DOT requirements, except that a driver may return empty to the motor carrier’s terminal or the driver’s normal work reporting location without complying with Parts 390 through 399.

When a driver is moving from emergency relief efforts to normal operations, a 10-hour break is required when the total time a driver operates conducting emergency relief efforts, or a combination of emergency relief and normal operations, equals 14 hours.

The declaration does not permit motor carriers to require or allow fatigued drivers to operate a commercial motor vehicle. A driver who informs a carrier that they need immediate rest must be given at least 10 consecutive hours before they are required to return to service.

The declaration and its extension took immediate effect and are operative through May 15, 2020.

Read the declaration and its extension.

2

EEOC Issues Updated Covid-19 Technical Assistance Publication

The EEOC publishes FAQ regarding the FEEOL and COVID-19.

On April 17, 2020, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) posted an updated technical assistance publication addressing questions arising under the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Laws related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The publication, What You Should Know About COVID-19 and the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and Other EEO Laws, expands on a previous publication that focused on the ADA and Rehabilitation Act, and adds questions-and-answers to anticipating return to work situations, making reasonable accommodations, and harassment.

3

OSHA to Exercise Enforcement Discretion for Good Faith Efforts During COVID-19

OSHA released interim guidance regarding evaluating employer’s good faith effort to comply with safety and health standards during the coronavirus pandemic. 

On April 16, 2020, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) released interim guidance for compliance safety and health officers when evaluating an employer’s good faith efforts to comply with safety and health standards during the coronavirus pandemic. The interim guidance is time-limited and in effect only during the current public health crisis.

According to the guidance, current infection control practices may limit the availability of employees, consultants, or contractors who normally provide OSHA training, auditing, equipment inspections, testing, and other essential safety and industrial hygiene services. Business closures and other restrictions may also preclude employee participation in training if trainers are unavailable, and access to medical testing facilities may be limited or suspended. Therefore, during an inspection, compliance safety and health officers are directed to assess an employer’s efforts to comply with standards that require annual or recurring audits, reviews, training, or assessments. For instance, officers are directed to evaluate whether the employer:

  • Explored all options to comply with applicable standards (use of virtual training or remote communication strategies);
  • Implemented interim alternative protections, such as engineering or administrative controls; and
  • Rescheduled required annual activity as soon as possible.

Employers unable to comply with OSHA requirements because local authorities required their workplace to close should demonstrate a good faith attempt to meet applicable requirements as soon as possible following the workplace’s re-opening. Additionally, OSHA will strongly consider an employer’s good faith compliance attempts when determining whether to cite a violation. However, OSHA may issue a citation if it finds an employer cannot demonstrate any efforts to comply. OSHA is also developing a program to conduct monitoring inspections from a randomized sampling of cases where the agency noted, but did not cite, violations. This is to ensure employers have taken corrective actions once normal activities resume.

The guidance took effect on April 16, 2020 and is in effect until further notice.

Read the interim guidance and more on OSHA’s COVID-19 webpage.

 

4

OSHA Recordkeeping Requirements and COVID-19

OSHA released interim guidance regarding enforcing its recordkeeping requirements in recording COVID-19 cases.

On April 10, 2020, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued interim guidance for enforcing its recordkeeping requirements in recording COVID-19 cases. COVID-19 is a recordable illness, and employers are responsible for recording cases of the disease if the case:

In areas where there is ongoing community transmission, employers other than those in the healthcare industry, emergency response organizations (e.g., emergency medical, firefighting, and law enforcement services), and correctional institutions may have difficulty making determinations about whether workers who contracted COVID-19 did so due to exposures at work. Accordingly, until further notice, OSHA will not enforce its recordkeeping requirements to require these employers to make work-relatedness determinations for COVID-19 cases, except where:

  • There is objective evidence that a COVID-19 case may be work-related; and
  • The evidence was reasonably available to the employer. Employers of workers in the healthcare industry, emergency response organizations, and correctional institutions must continue to make work-relatedness determinations. 

OSHA’s enforcement policy will provide certainty to the regulated community and help employers focus their response efforts on implementing good hygiene practices in their workplaces and otherwise mitigating COVID-19’s effects.

Read the interim guidance and more on OSHA’s COVID-19 webpage.

5

EEOC Issues Updated Covid-19 Technical Assistance Publication

The frist round of FAQ regarding Covid-19 from the EEOC.

On April 9, 2020, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) posted an updated and expanded technical assistance publication addressing questions under the federal equal employment opportunity laws related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The publicationWhat You Should Know About COVID-19 and the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and Other EEO Laws, expands on a previous publication that focused on the ADA and Rehabilitation Act, and adds responses to common inquiries in the following topics:

  • Disability related inquiries and medical exams;
  • Confidentiality of medical information;
  • Hiring and onboarding;
  • Reasonable accommodation; and
  • Furloughs and layoffs.

The EEOC also provides additional resources related to the pandemic in an employment context.

6

OSHA Reminder that Retaliation for Reporting Unsafe Conditions Prohibited

OSHA’s reminder to employers regarding retaliation against workers reporting unsafe conditions.

On April 8, 2020, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) released a reminder to employers that it is illegal to retaliate against workers when they report unsafe and unhealthful working conditions, including during the coronavirus pandemic. Retaliation may include termination, demotion, denial of overtime or promotion, or reduction in pay or hours.

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act), employees have the right to safe and healthy workplaces, and any worker who believes that their employer is retaliating against them for reporting unsafe working conditions is instructed to immediately contact OSHA.

Workers may contact OSHA or may file an online whistleblower complaint if they believe their employer has retaliated against them for exercising their rights under the whistleblower protection laws. The OSHA Whistleblower Protection Program webpage provides resources about worker rights, and includes fact sheets on whistleblower protections for employees in various industries along with frequently asked questions.

Read more about OSHA whistleblower protections.

7

DOL Guidance on Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation

The DOL’s announcement of Unemployment Insurance Guidance Letter. 

On April 4, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor announced publication of its Unemployment Insurance Guidance Letter 15-20 (UIPL 15-20) providing guidance to states for Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (FPUC). Under FPUC, states will administer an additional $600 weekly payment to certain eligible individuals who are receiving other benefits. This provision is contained in § 2104 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) enacted on March 27, 2020.

The program allows states to provide an additional $600 per week benefit to individuals who are collecting regular unemployment compensation, including Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) and Unemployment Compensation for Ex-Servicemembers (UCX), as well as the following unemployment compensation programs: 

  • Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC);
  • Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA);
  • Extended Benefits (EB);
  • Short­Time Compensation (STC);
  • Trade Readjustment Allowances (TRA);
  • Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); and
  • Payments under the Self-Employment Assistance (SEA) program.

FPUC benefit payments are fully federally funded.

The benefit payments under FPUC may begin as soon as the week after the execution of a signed agreement between the Department of Labor and states. The timeline for these payments will vary by state. As states begin providing this payment, eligible individuals will receive retroactive payments back to their date of eligibility or the signing of the state agreement, whichever came later. All states have executed agreements with the department as of March 28, 2020. The CARES Act specifies that FPUC benefit payments will end after payments for the last week of unemployment before July 31, 2020.

The guidance letter also includes guidance about protecting unemployment insurance program integrity, as the provisions in the CARES Act operate in tandem with the fundamental eligibility requirements of the federal-state UI program. The department is working with states receiving funding under the act to provide unemployment insurance benefits to those who are entitled to them.

Read the announcement.

8

Temporary Rule: Paid Leave under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act

New actions and protections under the DOL regarding the FFCRA. 

On April 1, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor announced new action regarding the protections and relief offered by the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act and Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act, both part of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA). The FFCRA reimburses private employers with fewer than 500 employees with tax credits for the cost of providing employees with paid leave taken for specified reasons related to COVID-19.

The Department’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) posted a temporary rule issuing regulations pursuant to this new law, effective April 1, 2020. The regulations implement public health emergency leave under Title I of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and emergency paid sick leave to assist working families facing public health emergencies arising out of the COVID-19 global pandemic. The leave provisions are created by a time-limited statutory authority established under the FFCRA and are set to expire on December 31, 2020. The temporary rule is effective from April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. 

In this temporary rule, the department:

  • Issues rules relevant to the administration of the FFCRA’s paid leave requirements.
  • Provides direction for administration of the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act (EPSLA), which requires that certain employers provide up to 80 hours of paid sick leave to employees who need to take leave from work for certain specified reasons related to COVID-19. These reasons may include the following:
    • The employee or someone the employee is caring for is subject to a government quarantine order or has been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine;
    • The employee is experiencing COVID-19 symptoms and is seeking medical attention; or,
    • The employee is caring for their son or daughter whose school or place of care is closed or whose childcare provider is unavailable for reasons related to COVID-19.
  • Provides direction for administration of the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act (EFMLEA), which requires that certain employers provide up to 10 weeks of paid, and two weeks unpaid, emergency family and medical leave to eligible employees if the employee is caring for their son or daughter whose school or place of care is closed or whose childcare provider is unavailable for reasons related to COVID-19.

Read more here and here.

9

COVID-19 and Employee Retention Credit

Information regarding a Refundable tax credit of 50% of up to $10,000 in wages. 

On March 31, 2020, the U.S. Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service launched the Employee Retention Credit. The refundable tax credit is 50 percent of up to $10,000 in wages paid by an eligible employer whose business has been financially impacted by COVID-19. The credit is available to all employers regardless of size, including tax-exempt organizations, with the following two exceptions:

  • State and local governments and their instrumentalities; and
  • Small businesses who take small business loans.

Qualifying employers must fall into one of the following categories, which are calculated each calendar quarter:

  • The employer’s business is fully or partially suspended by government order due to COVID-19 during the calendar quarter.
  • The employer’s gross receipts are below 50 percent of the comparable quarter in 2019. Once the employer’s gross receipts go above 80 percent of a comparable quarter in 2019, they no longer qualify after the end of that quarter.

In calculating the credit, the amount of the credit is 50 percent of qualifying wages paid up to $10,000 in total. Wages paid after March 12, 2020, and before January 1, 2021, are eligible for the credit. Wages considered for the credit are not limited to cash payments, but also include a portion of the cost of employer provided health care.

Qualifying wages are based on the average number of a business’s employees in 2019 as follows:

  • If the employer had 100 or fewer employees on average in 2019, the credit is based on wages paid to all employees, regardless if they worked or not. If the employees worked full-time and were paid for full-time work, then the employer still receives the credit.
  • If the employer had more than 100 employees on average in 2019, then the credit is allowed only for wages paid to employees who did not work during the calendar quarter.

Employers may be immediately reimbursed for the credit by reducing their required deposits of payroll taxes that have been withheld from their employees’ wages by the amount of the credit. Eligible employers will report their total qualified wages and the related health insurance costs for each quarter on their quarterly employment tax returns, or Form 941, beginning with the second quarter. If the employer’s employment tax deposits are not sufficient to cover the credit, the employer may receive an advance payment from the IRS by submitting Form 7200, Advance Payment of Employer Credits Due to COVID-19. Form 7200 may also be used by eligible employers to request an advance of the Employee Retention Credit.

Read more here.

Individual State Labor Laws

State Specific Labor Law Updates:

Compliance can weigh down even the most experienced professionals. Our HR Advisors, one click compliance Handbook ,Compliance Database, HR Tools and Employee Training are ready to help navigate HR all year long. Everything included with your AllMyHR™ Solutions

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

Previous Labor Laws & Information

Employment Law Updates: January 2020

Let the 2020 Federal Labor Law updates commence! 

It’s a brand new decade and if hindsight is 2020 (pun intended) we’re in for heavy employment law updates. Our tryHRIS HR Advisors are ready to help you navigate HR all year long.

States with 2020 Federal Labor law updates

Employment Law Updates: January 2020

1

Penalty Increases

The increased Federal Minimum Wage for Contractors and Tipped Employees became effective January 1, 2020. 

On January 15, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor published a final rule announcing an adjustment, per the Inflation Adjustment Act, to civil monetary penalties that it assesses under certain federal laws.

Some of these increases are as follows:

Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA):

  • Failure to furnish reports: $31 per plan year.
  • Failure/refusal to properly file plan annual report: $2,233 per day.
  • Failure to disclose certain documents: $1,767 per day.
  • Failure to fine annual report for MEWAs: $1,625 per day.

 

Occupational Safety and Health Act:

  • Serious violation: $13,494.
  • Other-than-serious violation: $13,494.
  • Willful violation: $134,937.
  • Repeat violation: $134,937.
  • Violation of posting requirement: $13,494.
  • Failure to abate: $13,494 per day.

 

Family and Medical Leave Act:

  • Willful violation of posting requirement: $176.

 

Fair Labor Standards Act:

  • Repeated or willful violation of minimum wage or overtime: $2,050.
  • Willful violations of wages under child labor laws: $2,050.
  • Child labor violations that cause serious injury or death: $59,413.
  • Willful or repeated child labor violations that cause serious injury or death: $118,826.

 

The final rule also increases penalties for the following federal laws:

  • Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act
  • Immigration and Nationality Act
  • Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act
  • Employee Polygraph Protection Act
  • Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act
  • Black Lung Benefits Act

 

The final rule is effective on January 15, 2020 and the increased penalties apply to those assessed after that date.

Read the final rule.

2

Joint Employer Final Rule

joint employer situation occurs when an employee has two or more employers who are jointly and severally (separately) liable for wages due to the employee under the FLSA.

On January 12, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor announced its final rule revising joint employer status under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and adoption of a four-factor balancing test to determine joint employer status when another person benefits from an employee’s work. 

Under the following four-factor balancing test, to be jointly liable the potential joint employer must actually exercise — directly or indirectly — one or more of the following control factors:

  1. Hire or fire the employee;
  2. Supervise and control the employee’s work schedule or conditions of employment to a substantial degree;
  3. Determine the employee’s rate and method of payment; and
  4. Maintain the employee’s employment records. (However, satisfaction of the maintenance of employment records factor alone does not demonstrate joint employer status.)

No single factor alone may determine whether an entity is a joint employer. Instead, the appropriate weight is given to each factor and varies depending on the circumstances.

The final rule also:

  • Clarifies that an employee’s economic dependence on a potential joint employer does not determine whether it is a joint employer under the FLSA;
  • Provides additional guidance on how to apply the four-factor test. For example, the other person’s ability, power, or reserved right (ability) to act in relation to the employee may be relevant for determining joint employer status, but such ability alone does not demonstrate joint employer status without some actual exercise of control (to be a joint employer the other person must actually exercise — directly or indirectly — one or more of the four control factors); and
  • Specifies that an employer’s franchisor, brand and supply, or similar business model and certain contractual agreements or business practices do not make joint employer status under the FLSA more or less likely.

The final rule publishes in the Federal Register on January 16, 2020 and is effective March 16, 2020.

Read more about the final rule.

3

Federal Minimum Wage for Contractors Poster

The increased Federal Minimum Wage for Contractors and Tipped Employees became effective January 1, 2020. 

In January 2020, the Federal Minimum Wage for Contractors poster was updated to reflect the minimum wage increase to $10.80 per hour that became effective on January 1, 2020. This minimum wage rate, established under Executive Order 13658, must be paid to workers performing work on or in connection with covered contracts. The poster also shows the rate, established January 1, 2019, for tipped employees performing work on or in connection with covered contracts, which is $7.55 per hour.

Employers must display this poster where employees may easily see it.

See the new official wage poster.

4

DOL Releases New Opinion Letters (FLSA and FMLA)

Three new opinion letters addressing compliance issues with both the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act.

On January 7, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced that it issued the following three new opinion letters that address compliance issues related to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA):

  • FLSA2020-1: Addressing calculating overtime pay for a non-discretionary lump sum bonus paid at the end of a multi-week training period. 
  • FMLA2020-1-A: Addressing whether a combined general health district must count the employees of the county in which the health district is located for the purpose of determining FMLA eligibility for its employees. 
  • FLSA2020-2: Addressing whether per-project payments satisfy the salary basis test for exemption.

What is an Opinion Letter?

An opinion letter is an official, written opinion by the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) regarding how a particular law applies in specific circumstances presented by the person or entity that requested the letter.

Read about these new opinion letters.

5

Fair Chance to Compete for Jobs Act of 2019

Prohibits Federal Contractors from dismissing a civil service applicant solely due to criminal history, prior to a conditional employment offer, with exceptions. 

On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed legislation S. 1790, enacting the Fair Chance to Compete for Jobs Act of 2019 (Fair Chance Act). Under the act, federal contractors are prohibited from requiring that an applicant for an appointment to a position in the civil service disclose their criminal history record information before the appointing authority extends a conditional employment offer. This does not apply if consideration of an applicant’s criminal history is otherwise required by law. The act also provides other exceptions. (For example, if the applicant is applying to a federal law enforcement officer position.)

The act is effective December 20, 2021.

Read US S. 1790.

6

Final 2020 W-4 Released

The final 2020 W4 Form was released on December 5, 2019. 

On December 5, 2019, the Internal Revenue Service released a final Form W-4 for use in 2020. Employees complete the Form W-4 so that their employers can withhold the correct federal tax from their paycheck. 

Significant Changes from the W4 Form 2019:

A significant change for the 2020 form is that it does not have withholding allowances because employees may no longer claim personal exemptions or dependency exemptions. Previously, the value of a withholding allowance was tied to the amount of the personal exemption.

For the new form, the following five steps (as opposed to allowances) are completed by the employee to determine their withholding:

  • Step 1: Personal information (including marital status).
  • Step 2: Multiple jobs (employee), or whether the employee’s spouse works. This step is completed if the employee holds more than one job at a time or is married filing jointly and their spouse also works. The correct amount of withholding depends on income earned from all of these jobs.
  • Steps 3 and 4: Claim dependents and (optional) other adjustments (specifically (a) other income that is not from jobs, (b) deductions, and (c) extra withholding). Steps 3 – 4(b) are completed on Form W-4 for only one job, and these steps are left blank for the other jobs. (Withholding is most accurate if an employee completes Steps 3 – 4(b) on the Form W-4 for the highest paying job.)
  • Step 5: Employee signature and date (signifying that all information is true and accurate under penalty of perjury)
  • Publication 15-T (still in draft form) assists employers in determining the amount of federal income tax to withhold from their employees’ wages.

Employee W-4 Requirements

Employees who have submitted Form W-4 in any year before 2020 are not required to submit a new form merely because of the redesign. Employers will continue to compute withholding based on the information from the employee’s most recently submitted Form W-4.

Read about the Form W-4, and FAQs about the form. Download the W4 Form 2020, and read about Publication 15-T.

7

Read the Remaining Five Federal Labor Law Updates

Individual State Labor Laws

State Specific Labor Law Updates:

Compliance can weigh down even the most experienced professionals. Our tryHRIS HR Advisors, one click compliance Handbook ,Compliance Database, HR Tools and Employee Training are ready to help navigate HR all year long. All for less than a latte a day.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

Previous Labor Laws & Information

Texas Employment Law 2019: October

Texas State Labor Law had one update in October 2019 specific to San Antonio.

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which alerts you to all Federal & your selected State(s) law, regulation & requirement changes.

Texas State Labor Laws: 2019 Updates

Download Law Alerts for Future Reference

Texas Employment Law Update:

San Antonio Revises Sick and Safe Leave Ordinance

City specific revisions from the San Antonio City Council. 

In October 2019, the San Antonio City Council approved the following revisions to the city’s sick and safe leave ordinance:

  • Identifies the leave as sick and safe time (previously categorized as earned paid sick and safe leave) and clarifies that leave is a fringe benefit, not a wage or salary component.
  • Redefines covered employees and no longer requires an employee to have worked 80 hours in a year.
  • Includes a worker who is typically based outside of the city (the employee works outside the geographical boundaries of the city of San Antonio for more than 50 percent of work hours in a year) and performs work in the city on an occasional basis as a covered employee under the ordinance if they perform more than 240 hours of work in the city within a year.
  • Expands the definition of family member to include domestic partners and same-sex significant others, household members, and more. The revisions also liberally interpret the concept of parenthood.
  • The accrual rate is modified to permit employees to accrue one hour of paid sick and safe leave for every 30 hours worked with a baseline amount of up to 56 hours per year.
  • Payment of accrued leave is not required upon separation or rehire and may not be calculated as an increase to salary or wages for an employee.
  • Modifies usage requirements by providing that an established eligibility period may not exceed 90 days from the start of employment to when the leave may be used.

The revisions also modify the following:

  • Repercussions for abuse of sick and safe leave;
  • Confidentiality and nondisclosure terms;
  • When an employer provides a more generous policy;
  • Notice, recordkeeping, and signage requirements; and
  • Enforcement, violations, and penalties.

The ordinance continues to be effective until December 1, 2019. See the revisions here

Here’s a helpful HR Tool from our Compliance Database.

Our advisors help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to learn how we can help streamline HR for professionals or office managers.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

New York Labor Law 2019: October

New York Labor Law had two updates to legislation this month. These include the expansion of the Human Rights Law Coverage and New Human Rights Guidance to the NYCHRL. 

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which alerts you to all Federal & State law, regulation & requirement changes.

New York Employment Law Updates

New York Labor Law Update 1:

NYC Human Rights Law Coverage Expanded

This legislation further defines coverage specifications.

On October 13, 2019, the New York City Council enacted legislation Int. No. 136-A to amend the city’s Human Rights Law to clarify the following:

  • Covered employers do not include those with fewer than four employees at all times during the period beginning twelve months before the start of an unlawful discriminatory practice and continuing through the end of it. Additionally, an employer’s parent, spouse, domestic partner or child working for are included in determining employee count only, not for legal governance.
  • Covered employees include all the following:
    • Independent contractors.
    • Interns and freelancers.

The law is effective January 11, 2020.

New York Labor Law Update 2:

New York City Commission Provides New Human Rights Guidance

New legal enforcement guidance on the Human Rights Law protecting against discrimination. 

In September 2019, the New York City Commission on Human Rights released new legal enforcement guidance on the New York City Human Rights Law’s (NYCHRL) protections against discrimination based on actual or perceived immigration status and actual or perceived national origin. The NYCHRL prohibits discrimination on the basis of actual or perceived alienage and citizenship status, and national origin, among other categories by most employers in New York City.

If these law alerts give you more questions than answers, our advisors can help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to see how we can help streamline HR for professionals or office managers.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

California Labor Laws 2019: October

There have been several changes to California Labor Laws this October. These include:

  • Six city updates to California Minimum Wage.
  • Eleven Worker Protection Bills
  • Five Consumer Privacy Act Amendments
  • Seven additional employment law updates, legislation and assembly bills including updates to: AB5, Wage Payments, Leave of Absence, Data Breeches, Settlement Agreements and more. 
Map of USA Businesses for HRIS System Cost

Download the PDF of California Employment Law Update for Future Reference

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which keeps you updated when all Federal & State laws, regulations & requirements change.

California Employment Law Update 1:

6 City Specific Minimum Wage Increases & Official Posters

Six Cities in California have updated their minimum wage beginning January 1, 2020.  

San Diego Minimum Wage Update:

On September 26, 2019, the City of San Diego Treasurer announced that the city’s minimum wage rate will increase to $13 per hour effective January 1, 2020. All employers must pay each employee no less than the minimum wage for each hour worked within the geographic boundaries of the city. Employers must post the city’s official minimum wage notice where employees can easily see it. Failure to post it subjects employers to penalties. Download San Diego’s Official Wage Poster.

San Jose Minimum Wage Update:

In September 2019, the San Jose Office of the City Manager announced that the city’s minimum wage will increase to $15.25 per hour effective January 1, 2020. Employers are required to pay their employees a minimum hourly wage for work performed within the City of San José. Download San Jose’s Official Wage Poster.

El Cerrito Minimum Wage Update:

Beginning January 1, 2020, an employee who performs at least two hours of work in a particular workweek within the geographic limits of the City of El Cerrito must be paid no less than $15.37 per hour. This minimum wage rate applies equally to all employees, regardless of employer size. Download El Cerrito Official Wage Poster.

Mountain View Minimum Wage Update:

Beginning January 1, 2020, employers that are subject to the Mountain View Business License Tax or that maintain a facility in Mountain View must pay each employee who performs at least two hours of work per week in Mountain View, minimum wages of no less than $16.05 per hour. The minimum wage requirement applies to adult and minor employees who work two or more hours per week (tips not included). Download Mountain View’s Official Wage Poster.

Redwood City Minimum Wage Update:

In September 2019, the Redwood City Manager announced the city’s local minimum wage rate increases to $15.38 per hour effective on January 1, 2020. All businesses operating within the geographic boundaries of the city are required to pay at least the minimum wage rate for all employees working two or more hours per week. Download Redwood City’s Official Wage Poster.

San Mateo Minimum Wage Update:

Starting January 1, 2020, the minimum wage for the City of San Mateo will increase to $15.38 per hour for all employees. Employers are required to post the city’s official notice where employees may easily read it. Failure to post this notice subjects employers to penalties. Download San Mateo’s Official Wage Poster.

Here’s a helpful HR Tool from our Compliance Database.

California Employment Law Update 2:

California Consumer Privacy Act Amendments

The following Assembly Bills clarifies personal information, opt outs, business websites and authorizations.  

On October 11, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the following five bills that amend the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA):

  1. CA A.B. 25: Authorizes businesses to require authentication of a consumer if it is reasonable, in light of the nature of the personal information requested, in order to make a verifiable consumer request; authorizes a consumer to bring a private civil action against a business that violates its duty to implement reasonable security procedures and practices, if that failure results in a consumer’s personal information being subject to unauthorized access and exfiltration, or theft; and until January 1, 2021, provides businesses with exemptions from the CCPA for personal information that is collected from applicants (employee and human resources information) for employment, emergency contact information, and information that is necessary for the business to retain to administer workplace.
  2. CA A.B. 874: Clarifies that personal information under the CCPA does not include publicly available information, which is information that is lawfully made available from federal, state, or local government records but is not biometric information collected by a business about a consumer without the consumer’s knowledge. Also clarifies that personal information under the act does not include consumer information that is deidentified or aggregate consumer information.
  3. CA A.B. 1146: Excepts from the CCPA the right to opt out vehicle information or ownership information retained or shared between a new motor vehicle dealer and the vehicle’s manufacturer, if the information is shared for vehicle repair that is covered by a vehicle warranty or a recall.
  4. CA A.B. 1355: Until January 1, 2021, the law provides a business-to-business exemption for personal information a business collects about an employee, owner, director, officer, or contractor of a business when collected as part of business-to-business transactions; consumers may institute a civil action when non-encrypted and non-redacted personal information is subject to unauthorized access; consumer reporting agencies have an exemption for the collection, maintenance, disclosure, sale, communication, or use of personal information covered by the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act.
  5. CA A.B. 1564: Exclusively-online businesses with a direct relationship with a consumer from whom they collect personal information are only required to provide an email address for submitting requests for information required to be disclosed; if the business maintains a website, then the website must be available to consumers to submit requests for information that the business is required to disclose.

These laws are effective January 1, 2020

California Employment Law Update 3:

Settlement Agreements

New legislation regarding restrictions of settlement agreements.

On October 12, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the A.B. 749 legislation regarding settlement agreements. Specifically, the law states that an agreement to settle an employment dispute may not contain a provision prohibiting, preventing, or otherwise restricting a settling party that is an aggrieved person from obtaining future employment with the employer against which the aggrieved person has filed a claim, or any parent company, subsidiary, division, affiliate, or contractor of the employer. A provision in an agreement entered into on or after January 1, 2020 that violates this law is void as a matter of law and against public policy.

However, the law does not:

  • Preclude the employer and aggrieved person from making an agreement to end a current employment relationship or prohibit or otherwise restrict the settling aggrieved person from obtaining future employment with the settling employer, if the employer has made a good faith determination that the person engaged in sexual harassment or sexual assault; or
  • Require an employer to continue to employ or rehire a person if there is a legitimate nondiscriminatory or nonretaliatory reason for terminating the employment relationship or refusing to rehire the person.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

California Employment Law Update 4:

Arbitration Fees

The National Labor Relations Board adopted the ‘Contract coverage’ standard to replace the previous ‘clear and unmistakable waiver’ standard. 

On October 13, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation S.B. 707 regarding an employer’s failure to pay arbitration costs. Generally, under the law, an employer’s failure to pay arbitration fees under an employer-imposed mandatory arbitration agreement is a breach, waives the agreement, and the non-breaching party may bring a claim in court.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

California Employment Law Update 5:

Gun Violence Restraining Orders

This legislation allows co-workers or employers to file a specific employment restraining order prohibiting the subject’s legal access to guns due to them displaying a potential and significant danger.

On October 11, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation A.B. 61 allowing an employer or a co-worker to file a petition requesting that a court issue a gun violence restraining order prohibiting the subject of the petition (subject) from having in their custody or control, owning, purchasing, possessing, or receiving a firearm or ammunition for one to five years because:

  • The subject poses a significant danger, in the near future, of causing personal injury to themselves or another by having firearm; and
  • The restraining order is necessary to prevent personal injury to the subject or another because less restrictive alternatives either have been tried and found to be ineffective or are inadequate or inappropriate for the circumstances.

For a co-worker to apply for the restraining order they must have substantial and regular interactions with the subject for at least one year and also have received the employer’s approval to file the petition. An employer or co-worker may also request renewal of the restraining order three months prior to its expiration.

The law is effective January 1, 2020 and is operative September 1, 2020

California Employment Law Update 6:

Personal Information and Data Breaches

This legislation clarifies the definition of personal information under data breach provisions. 

On October 11, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation A.B. 1130 clarifying the definition of personal information under the state’s data breach provisions to include:

  • A driver’s license number, California identification card number, tax identification number, passport number, military identification number, or other unique identification number issued on a government document commonly used to verify the identity of a specific individual; and
  • Unique biometric data generated from measurements or technical analysis of human body characteristics, such as a fingerprint, retina, or iris image, used to authenticate a specific individual. However, unique biometric data does not include a physical or digital photograph, unless used or stored for facial recognition purposes.

Additionally, under the law, in a business’s security breach notification where the breach involves biometric data, the notice may include instructions on how to notify other entities that use the same type of biometric data (that was subject to breach) as an authenticator to no longer rely on it for authentication purposes.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

California Employment Law Update 7:

Worker Protection Bills

These bills address sexual harassment, wage and health protections for California’s workforce. 

On October 10, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the following bills aimed at increasing protections for California’s workforce, which includes legislation drafted in response to the #MeToo movement focused on sexual harassment prevention and accountability:

These bills are effective January 1, 2020.

California Employment Law Update 8:

AB5 Amendment

This legislation amends the Assembly Bill 5 regarding worker classification exemptions. 

On October 2, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation A.B. 170 exempting both of the following from the Dynamex/California Assembly Bill 5 independent contractor provisions:

  • A newspaper distributor working under contract with a newspaper publisher; and
  • A newspaper carrier working under contract, either with a newspaper publisher or newspaper distributor.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

California Employment Law Update 9:

Additional Leave of Absence Requirement for Living Organ Donators.

This legislation requires employers to provide a leave of absence for employees choosing to become a living tissue donor. 

On September 20, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation A.B. 1223 modifying Cal. Lab. Code Ann. § 1510 and requiring private employers to provide leave of absences to:

An employee who is an organ donor, leave as follows:

  • Paid leave of absence for up to 30 business days in a one-year period to donate an organ to another person; and
  • Additional, unpaid leave of absence for up to 30 business days in a one-year period for the organ donation.

An employee who is a bone marrow donor, up to five business days in a one-year period to donate bone marrow to another person.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

California Employment Law Update 10:

Print Shoot Employees and Wage Payment

This legislation enacts new laws for print shoot employees and their wage payment. 

On September 5, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation  S.B. 671 enacting new laws for print shoot employees and their wage payment. A print shoot employee is hired for a limited time and supports a still image shoot, including film or digital photography, for use in print, digital, or internet media. Under the law:

  • Upon termination, print shoot employees are entitled to receive wages earned but not yet paid by the next regular payday that is an employer-designated day for wage payment during the payroll period when termination occurred.
  • Wages may be mailed to the employee or provided at a location as specified by the employer in the county where the employee was hired or performed labor.
  • Payment is deemed as made on the date wages are mailed or the date when provided at the employer-determined location, whichever is earlier.

 The law took effect September 5, 2019.

If these law alerts have you a bit overwhelmed and you find you have more questions than answers, our advisors can help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to see how we can help streamline HR for professionals or office managers.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

What AB5 Compliance Means for California Employers

October 2019: Update on AB5

Regarding Independent Contractors and Newspaper Distributors​

On October 2, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation (A.B. 170) exempting both of the following from the Dynamex/California Assembly Bill 5 independent contractor provisions:

  • A newspaper distributor working under contract with a newspaper publisher; and
  • A newspaper carrier working under contract, either with a newspaper publisher or newspaper distributor.

Dynamex/California Assembly Bill 5 amended the California law by clarifying that a person providing labor or services for remuneration will be considered an employee rather than an independent contractor unless the hiring entity demonstrates that all of the following conditions are satisfied ABC Test, see below.

Read the official update: CA A.B. 170

What does AB5 Mean for California Employers?

On Wednesday, September 18th 2019 California Governor Gavin Newsome placed the final signature on the AB 5 legislation, changing the face of worker classification in California. With the fifth leading economy in the world, this reclassification affects as many as 2 Million workers; transforming them from independent contractors into employees almost overnight.

Independent contractor

This law, brought upon by the infamous Dynamex ruling, amends the California Labor Code, California Unemployment Insurance Code and the IWC wage orders. These amendments state all ‘hiring entities’ must now classify ‘all persons that provide services or labor’ as employees UNLESS that ‘hiring entity’ can demonstrate that ALL conditions of the ABC test (below) are met.

The ABC Test

  1. The person is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact;
  2. The person performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and
  3. The person is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.

What AB5 Classification Changes Mean for Employers

Though UBER, Lyft, and Grubhub have been the center focus due to the obvious and serious implications of this change to their business model, most employers are in the dark about what this could mean for them. As always, every major change regarding employment law comes with the unpreventable compliance nightmares, and AB5 will certainly be no different.

By January 1, 2020, California businesses, excluding those granted an exception (see below), will have to comply with the ABC test ruling or face a host of legal issues.

Workers now considered employees under the ABC test will be eligible for the following:

  • Minimum Wage
  • Overtime Pay
  • Meal and Break Rest
  • Worker’s Compensation Coverage
  • Unemployment Insurance
  • Various Benefits
  • Paid Sick Leave
  • State Family Leave (PDL, FMLA/CFRA, NPLA, FEHA, PFL, STD)

 

We’re here to help with this.

Click to Download the California Leave Requirements Chart.

And, while the law takes full effect beginning January 1, 2020, the retroactive implications of AB5 mean all previous independent contractors who are now considered employee status are covered by state civil rights laws including discrimination and harassment protections. Additionally, employers have to accept the possibility of these workers forming Labor Unions.

In short, this new employment law makes it much more difficult for many companies to classify workers in California as independent contractors, while also increasing the difficulty for these businesses to hire smaller entrepreneurial businesses.

The List of Additional Business Compliance Requirements

Above and beyond the tasks of defining workers under these new classifications, come the additional requirements such as:

  • Updating your Employee Handbook to include these compliance specifications.
  • Providing State required Harassment Prevention Training to everyone now considered an employee.
  • Calculating correct Leave Requirements.
  • Calculating Wages, Break Periods and Overtime.

The Exceptions to the Ruling

Many employers in California became aware of the potentially detrimental change coming back in April 2018, with the California’s Supreme Court’s ruling to adopt the ABC test to determine independent contractor status. Certain professions were granted amnesty under the new classification requirements. 

These exceptions include:

  • Doctors
  • Dentists
  • Veterinarians
  • Lawyers
  • Architects
  • Engineers
  • Private Investigators
  • Accountants
  • Securities Broker-Dealers
  • Investment Advisors
  • Human Resource Administrators
  • Travel Agents
  • Marketers
  • Graphic Designers
  • Grant Writers
  • Fine Artists
  • Certain Photographers or Photo Journalists
  • Certain Freelance Writers

 

Other exceptions include stipulations such as:

Commercial Fisherman are exempt for all requirements except unemployment insurance.

Estheticians, electrologists, manicurists, barbers and cosmetologists are exempt ONLY if they:

  • Set their own rates.
  • Schedule Their Own Clients and;
  • Follow several other requirements specific to independent contractors rather than employees (as per the ABC test.)

Salespersons are exempt only if their pay is based on actual sales as opposed to wholesale purchases or referrals.

Though this exemption list may continue to grow with future legislation, businesses in California must adjust to AB5 Compliance quickly. And our services can make this transition as easy as possible.

Services We Offer that Expedite California AB5 Compliance

We understand how major changes in employment law effect businesses, leaving them wondering where to turn for the right answers. The services we’re offering to small businesses nationwide will now benefit California employers in unprecedented ways. These specific services include:

These 25 Credentialed HR Advisors have extensive knowledge of California Employment compliance. They are available by phone, chat or email from 6:00 AM to 5:00 PM PST. Turn to them with all your AB 5 compliance questions, as well as other tough HR questions that arise.

Complete with Federal, State and Industry specific, ERISA Attorney Written Content; our Handbook alerts you to every compliance change in real time, providing self-updated attorney written content for your approval. One click and you remain compliant with every change. Automatic Updates are included for 1 year and can be renewed. Multi-State and Spanish translation are also available at an additional cost.

Or included with our Complete TrainingUnlimited Supervisor Participants for one low cost. This online training comes on a digital progress tracking dashboard and can be offered individually or completed in a group setting. Satisfies Ab1825/SB 1343 requirements. Spanish Version also available. Harassment Prevention Training for Employees available for additional cost.

Available Only With Complete Package

A private ‘search engine feature’ built specifically for regulatory compliance. Updated Daily. Provides access to state law alerts, regulation and legislation changes, white papers, checklists, forms, sample policies, toolkits and invaluable HR tools including:

  1. Employee Classification Tool
  2. State Law Comparison Tool
  3. Compliance Calendar
  4. Job Description Builder
  5. Salary Calculator
  6. Performance Review Tools
  7. Vast Webinar Library (Recertification Webinars)

$995/Year or $99/Month

Includes everything above and:

  1. 300+ Certified Training Courses for Unlimited Employees (see Catalog)
  2. Pop Document Builder
  3. Wrap Document Builder
  4. Custom Training Program Expertly Built for Your Needs
  5. 14-Day Money Back Guarantee*

 

We’re here to help you manage risk and liability easily, so you can get back to what you do best.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

*14-Day Money Back Guarantee Stipulations

Money Back Guarantee valid for Membership accounts 14 days from date of purchase. Guarantee voided with completion of Employee Handbook, Employee Training Course or Benefit Documents (POP/WRAP).

Illinois Employment Law Updates: September 2019

Illinois Governor Pritzker amended the Personal Information Protection Act to include a mandatory notice of any and all breaches to be reported to the Attorney General. 

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which alerts you the moment State and Federal employment laws, regulations or requirements change.

chicago IL Employment Law Alerts

Employment Law Update: Personal Information Protection Act Amended

This law, amended in August, is effective as of January 1, 2020.

On August 9, 2019, Governor J.B. Pritzker signed legislation (S.B. 1624) amending Illinois’ Personal Information Protection Act to require data collectors that are required to issue data breach notices to more than 500 Illinois residents, as a result of a single security breach, to also provide notice to the Illinois Attorney General (AG) that contains:

  • A description of the nature of the breach, unauthorized acquisition, or use;
  • The number of Illinois residents affected by the incident at the time of notification; and
  • Any steps the data collector has taken, or plans to take, related to the incident.

Notice to the AG must be completed in the most expedient time possible, without unreasonable delay, and no later than when notice is provided to consumers. If the date of the breach is unknown when the notice is sent to the AG, then the data collector must send it as soon as possible. Upon receipt of the notice, the AG may publish the name of the data collector that suffered the breach, the types of personal information compromised, and its date range.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

Read IL S.B. 1624

Who will be affected by this IL PIPA amendment?

Any Illinois institution who “handles, collects, disseminates, or otherwise deals with nonpublic personal information” is considered a data collector and is directly affected by this amendment.

What constitutes "Personal Data"?

“Personal data” is defined as an individual’s first name (or initial) and last name, in combination with any one or more of the following:

  • Driver’s license number or State identification card number
  • Social security number
  • Account number or credit or debit card number
  • An account number or credit card number in combination with any security code, access code or password that would allow access to an individual’s financial properties.

If you have questions about this employment law update, our advisors can help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to see how we can help streamline HR.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

Previous Illinois Law Alerts FOR EMPLOYERS

California Law Alerts: September 2019

On September 18, 2019 California Governor Newsome signed final legislation for AB 5, drastically altering worker classification compliance. See official law alert below or Read How AB5 Compliance Affects CA Employers

On August 30, 2019 the California Fair Employment and Housing Act was amended to extend the Sexual Harassment Training deadline by one year. (S. B. 778)

Additionally, the Pregnancy Leave Brochure was updated to include new rights and obligations included in the New Parent Leave Act. 

California Law Alerts for September 2019

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which alerts you the moment Federal & State laws, regulations or requirements change, keeping you informed.

Law Alert 3: Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) Redefines Worker Classification

The new legislation amends the California Labor Code, the California Unemployment Insurance Code, and for the Industrial Welfare Commission’s wage orders, to define a person providing labor or services for remuneration as an employee rather than an independent contractor unless the hiring entity demonstrates that all of the following conditions are satisfied for the ABC Test.

On September 18, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation (A.B. 5) codifying the California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. V. Superior Court of Los Angeles, where the court “cited the harm to misclassified workers who lose significant workplace protections, the unfairness to employers who must compete with companies that misclassify, and the loss to the state of needed revenue from companies that use misclassification to avoid obligations such as payment of payroll taxes, payment of premiums for workers’ compensation, Social Security, unemployment, and disability insurance.”

Specifically, the law amends the California Labor Code, the California Unemployment Insurance Code, and for the Industrial Welfare Commission’s wage orders (IWC wage orders), a person providing labor or services for remuneration will be considered an employee rather than an independent contractor unless the hiring entity demonstrates that all of the following conditions are satisfied (ABC Test):

  1. The person is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact;
  2. The person performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and
  3. The person is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.

The law clarifies:

  • Any exceptions to the terms “employee,” “employer,” “employ,” or “independent contractor,” and any extensions of employer status or liability, that are expressly made by a provision of the Labor Code, the Unemployment Insurance Code, or in an applicable IWC wage order, including, but not limited to, the definition of “employee” in subdivision 2(E) of Wage Order No. 2, remain in effect.
  • That it does not apply to the following occupations, and instead, the determination of employee or independent contractor status for individuals in those occupations is governed by Borello (a multi-factor test):
    • A person or organization who is licensed by the California Department of Insurance pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 1621 – insurance agents), Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 1760 – surplus line brokers), or Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 1831 – life and disability insurance analysts) of Part 2 of Division 1 of the Insurance Code.
    • A licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, podiatrist, psychologist, or veterinarian performing professional or medical services provided to or by a health care entity.
    • A licensed, practicing lawyer, architect, engineer, private investigator, or accountant.
    • A securities broker-dealer or investment adviser or their agents and representatives that are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or licensed by the State of California.
    • A direct sales salesperson.
    • A commercial fisherman working on an American vessel. 
  • That the holding in Dynamex does not apply to a contract for professional services, defined within the law, and instead the determination of whether the individual is an employee or independent contractor is governed by Borello if the hiring entity demonstrates that all of the following factors are satisfied:
    • The individual maintains a business location, which may include the individual’s residence, that is separate from the hiring entity. However, individual may choose to perform services at the location of the hiring entity.
    • If work is performed more than six months after the effective date of the law, the individual has a business license, in addition to any required professional licenses or permits for the individual to practice in their profession.
    • The individual has the ability to set or negotiate their own rates for the services performed.
    • Outside of project completion dates and reasonable business hours, the individual has the ability to set their own hours.
    • The individual is customarily engaged in the same type of work performed under contract with another hiring entity or holds themselves out to other potential customers as available to perform the same type of work.
    • The individual customarily and regularly exercises discretion and independent judgment in the performance of the services.

Moreover, the law and Dynamex do not apply to:

  • Specific occupations subject to the state’s Business and Professions Code (real estate licensee and repossession agency);
  • A bona fide business-to-business contracting relationship under specific conditions;
  • The relationship between a contractor and an individual performing work pursuant to a subcontract in the construction industry;
  • The relationship between a referral agency and a service provider under specific conditions; and
  • The relationship between a motor club with certificate of authority and an individual performing services pursuant to a contract between the motor club and a third party to provide motor club services utilizing the employees and vehicles of the third party.

The law also states that an action for injunctive relief to prevent the continued misclassification of employees as independent contractors may be prosecuted against the employer in court, in addition to any other remedies available.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

Read the governor’s signing message and CA A.B. 5

Law Alert 2: Sexual Harassment Training Requirement Deadline Extended.

This legislation extends the deadline from January 2020 to January 2021 due to the outcry from the business community. Employers now have an additional 12 months to provide their Supervisors and Employees with approved sexual harassment training.  

On August 30, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation (S.B. 778) amending the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. Employers with five or more employees are required by January 1, 2021, to provide:

  • At least two hours of classroom or other effective interactive training and education regarding sexual harassment to all supervisory employees in California; and
  • At least one hour of classroom or other effective interactive training and education regarding sexual harassment to all nonsupervisory employees in California.

Thereafter, each covered employer must provide sexual harassment training and education to each employee in California once every two years. New nonsupervisory employees must be trained within six months of hire and new supervisory employees must be trained within six months of their assumption of a supervisory position.

The law also clarifies that an employer who has provided this training and education to an employee in 2019 is not required to provide refresher training and education again until two years thereafter. Additionally, beginning January 1, 2020, seasonal, temporary, or other employees that are hired to work for less than six months, must be provided sexual harassment training by their employer within 30 calendar days after hire date, or 100 hours worked — whichever is earlier.

The law took effect August 30, 2019.

Read CA S.B. 778

tryHRIS offers California Approved Sexual Harassment Training for Supervisors. $95 per course for Unlimited Supervisors. Completion Certificates included.

Law Alert 1: Pregnancy Leave Brochure Updated

In August 2019, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing updated its pregnancy leave brochure to include information about rights and obligations under the state’s New Parent Leave Act.

View New Brochure.

If you have questions regarding these or other law alerts, our advisors can help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to see how we can help streamline HR for professionals or office managers.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

Illinois Employment Law Alerts: August 2019

Illinois was subject to two employment law changes in August 2019. The first law change is in regards to the Equal Pay Act and includes the Salary History Ban, mirroring New York’s law change a few days prior. 

The second law alert is in regards to Healthcare Workers Background Check Act Work Force Intermediaries and Organizations providing pro bono legal services..

regulatory compliance database library

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which alerts you the moment Federal & State laws, regulations or requirements change.

Download a PDF of these Law Alerts.

IL Employment Law Alert 1: Equal Pay Act & Salary History Ban

On July 31, 2019, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed legislation amending the state’s Equal Pay Act (IL H.B. 834) where a wage differential is permitted based on any factor other than one that would be unlawful discrimination under the Illinois Human Rights Act

However, this factor:

  • May not be based on or derived from a differential in compensation based on sex or another protected characteristic;
  • Must be job-related with respect to the position and consistent with a business necessity; and
  • Must account for the differential.

The law also makes it unlawful for employers to:

  • Require that employees sign a contract or waiver prohibiting discussion or disclosure of their wages, including information about their salary, benefits, or other compensation. Employers may prohibit certain employees from disclosing information about other employees without prior written consent from the employee whose information is sought or requested.
  • Screen applicants based on their current or prior wages or salary histories, including benefits or other compensation, by requiring that the wage or salary history of an applicant satisfy minimum or maximum criteria.
  • Request or require a wage or salary history as a condition of being considered for employment, as a condition of being interviewed, as a condition of continuing to be considered for an offer of employment, or as a condition of an offer of employment or an offer of compensation.
  • Request or require that an applicant disclose wage or salary history as a condition of employment.
  • Seek the wage or salary history, including benefits or other compensation, of an applicant from any current or former employer, unless:
    • The applicant’s wage or salary history is a matter of public record; or
    • The applicant is a current employee and is applying for a position with the current employer.

The law permits employers to provide information about the wages, benefits, compensation, or salary offered in relation to a position and engage in discussions with an applicant about wage or salary, benefits, and other compensation expectations. Additionally, an employer is not in violation of the law and its protections if an applicant voluntarily and without prompting discloses his or her current or prior wage or salary history, including benefits or other compensation, on the condition that the employer does not consider or rely on the voluntary disclosure as a factor in determining whether to extend a job offer, in making a compensation offer, or in determining future wages, salary, benefits, or other compensation.

The law is effective August 29, 2019.

Read IL H.B. 834

IL Employment Law Alert 2: Healthcare Worker Background Check Act and Workforce Intermediaries

On July 31, 2019, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed legislation (S.B. 1965) permitting workforce intermediaries and organizations providing pro bono legal services to initiate a fingerprint-based criminal history record check if a conditional offer of employment has not been made and a background check has not been previously conducted for an individual who has a disqualifying conviction and is receiving services from such organizations.

Workforce Intermediaries are organizations that function to provide job training and employment services and include institutions of higher education, faith-based and community organizations, and workforce investment boards. 

Organizations providing pro bono legal services are those providing legal services at no cost or at a significantly reduced cost to the recipient. These services are designed to help individuals overcome statutory barriers that would prevent them from entering positions in the healthcare industry.

The law took effect July 31, 2019.

Read IL S.B. 1965

Schedule your complimentary consultation today. Our HR Advisors help solve business’s difficult HR issues every day. 

If these law alerts have you a bit overwhelmed and you find you have more questions than answers, our advisors can help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to see how we can help streamline HR for professionals or office managers.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature