Employment Law Updates: January 2020

Let the 2020 Federal Labor Law updates commence! 

It’s a brand new decade and if hindsight is 2020 (pun intended) we’re in for heavy employment law updates. Our tryHRIS HR Advisors are ready to help you navigate HR all year long.

States with 2020 Federal Labor law updates

Employment Law Updates: January 2020

1

Penalty Increases

The increased Federal Minimum Wage for Contractors and Tipped Employees became effective January 1, 2020. 

On January 15, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor published a final rule announcing an adjustment, per the Inflation Adjustment Act, to civil monetary penalties that it assesses under certain federal laws.

Some of these increases are as follows:

Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA):

  • Failure to furnish reports: $31 per plan year.
  • Failure/refusal to properly file plan annual report: $2,233 per day.
  • Failure to disclose certain documents: $1,767 per day.
  • Failure to fine annual report for MEWAs: $1,625 per day.

 

Occupational Safety and Health Act:

  • Serious violation: $13,494.
  • Other-than-serious violation: $13,494.
  • Willful violation: $134,937.
  • Repeat violation: $134,937.
  • Violation of posting requirement: $13,494.
  • Failure to abate: $13,494 per day.

 

Family and Medical Leave Act:

  • Willful violation of posting requirement: $176.

 

Fair Labor Standards Act:

  • Repeated or willful violation of minimum wage or overtime: $2,050.
  • Willful violations of wages under child labor laws: $2,050.
  • Child labor violations that cause serious injury or death: $59,413.
  • Willful or repeated child labor violations that cause serious injury or death: $118,826.

 

The final rule also increases penalties for the following federal laws:

  • Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act
  • Immigration and Nationality Act
  • Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act
  • Employee Polygraph Protection Act
  • Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act
  • Black Lung Benefits Act

 

The final rule is effective on January 15, 2020 and the increased penalties apply to those assessed after that date.

Read the final rule.

2

Joint Employer Final Rule

joint employer situation occurs when an employee has two or more employers who are jointly and severally (separately) liable for wages due to the employee under the FLSA.

On January 12, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor announced its final rule revising joint employer status under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and adoption of a four-factor balancing test to determine joint employer status when another person benefits from an employee’s work. 

Under the following four-factor balancing test, to be jointly liable the potential joint employer must actually exercise — directly or indirectly — one or more of the following control factors:

  1. Hire or fire the employee;
  2. Supervise and control the employee’s work schedule or conditions of employment to a substantial degree;
  3. Determine the employee’s rate and method of payment; and
  4. Maintain the employee’s employment records. (However, satisfaction of the maintenance of employment records factor alone does not demonstrate joint employer status.)

No single factor alone may determine whether an entity is a joint employer. Instead, the appropriate weight is given to each factor and varies depending on the circumstances.

The final rule also:

  • Clarifies that an employee’s economic dependence on a potential joint employer does not determine whether it is a joint employer under the FLSA;
  • Provides additional guidance on how to apply the four-factor test. For example, the other person’s ability, power, or reserved right (ability) to act in relation to the employee may be relevant for determining joint employer status, but such ability alone does not demonstrate joint employer status without some actual exercise of control (to be a joint employer the other person must actually exercise — directly or indirectly — one or more of the four control factors); and
  • Specifies that an employer’s franchisor, brand and supply, or similar business model and certain contractual agreements or business practices do not make joint employer status under the FLSA more or less likely.

The final rule publishes in the Federal Register on January 16, 2020 and is effective March 16, 2020.

Read more about the final rule.

3

Federal Minimum Wage for Contractors Poster

The increased Federal Minimum Wage for Contractors and Tipped Employees became effective January 1, 2020. 

In January 2020, the Federal Minimum Wage for Contractors poster was updated to reflect the minimum wage increase to $10.80 per hour that became effective on January 1, 2020. This minimum wage rate, established under Executive Order 13658, must be paid to workers performing work on or in connection with covered contracts. The poster also shows the rate, established January 1, 2019, for tipped employees performing work on or in connection with covered contracts, which is $7.55 per hour.

Employers must display this poster where employees may easily see it.

See the new official wage poster.

4

DOL Releases New Opinion Letters (FLSA and FMLA)

Three new opinion letters addressing compliance issues with both the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act.

On January 7, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced that it issued the following three new opinion letters that address compliance issues related to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA):

  • FLSA2020-1: Addressing calculating overtime pay for a non-discretionary lump sum bonus paid at the end of a multi-week training period. 
  • FMLA2020-1-A: Addressing whether a combined general health district must count the employees of the county in which the health district is located for the purpose of determining FMLA eligibility for its employees. 
  • FLSA2020-2: Addressing whether per-project payments satisfy the salary basis test for exemption.

What is an Opinion Letter?

An opinion letter is an official, written opinion by the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) regarding how a particular law applies in specific circumstances presented by the person or entity that requested the letter.

Read about these new opinion letters.

5

Fair Chance to Compete for Jobs Act of 2019

Prohibits Federal Contractors from dismissing a civil service applicant solely due to criminal history, prior to a conditional employment offer, with exceptions. 

On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed legislation S. 1790, enacting the Fair Chance to Compete for Jobs Act of 2019 (Fair Chance Act). Under the act, federal contractors are prohibited from requiring that an applicant for an appointment to a position in the civil service disclose their criminal history record information before the appointing authority extends a conditional employment offer. This does not apply if consideration of an applicant’s criminal history is otherwise required by law. The act also provides other exceptions. (For example, if the applicant is applying to a federal law enforcement officer position.)

The act is effective December 20, 2021.

Read US S. 1790.

6

Final 2020 W-4 Released

The final 2020 W4 Form was released on December 5, 2019. 

On December 5, 2019, the Internal Revenue Service released a final Form W-4 for use in 2020. Employees complete the Form W-4 so that their employers can withhold the correct federal tax from their paycheck. 

Significant Changes from the W4 Form 2019:

A significant change for the 2020 form is that it does not have withholding allowances because employees may no longer claim personal exemptions or dependency exemptions. Previously, the value of a withholding allowance was tied to the amount of the personal exemption.

For the new form, the following five steps (as opposed to allowances) are completed by the employee to determine their withholding:

  • Step 1: Personal information (including marital status).
  • Step 2: Multiple jobs (employee), or whether the employee’s spouse works. This step is completed if the employee holds more than one job at a time or is married filing jointly and their spouse also works. The correct amount of withholding depends on income earned from all of these jobs.
  • Steps 3 and 4: Claim dependents and (optional) other adjustments (specifically (a) other income that is not from jobs, (b) deductions, and (c) extra withholding). Steps 3 – 4(b) are completed on Form W-4 for only one job, and these steps are left blank for the other jobs. (Withholding is most accurate if an employee completes Steps 3 – 4(b) on the Form W-4 for the highest paying job.)
  • Step 5: Employee signature and date (signifying that all information is true and accurate under penalty of perjury)
  • Publication 15-T (still in draft form) assists employers in determining the amount of federal income tax to withhold from their employees’ wages.

Employee W-4 Requirements

Employees who have submitted Form W-4 in any year before 2020 are not required to submit a new form merely because of the redesign. Employers will continue to compute withholding based on the information from the employee’s most recently submitted Form W-4.

Read about the Form W-4, and FAQs about the form. Download the W4 Form 2020, and read about Publication 15-T.

7

Read the Remaining Five Federal Labor Law Updates

Individual State Labor Laws

State Specific Labor Law Updates:

Compliance can weigh down even the most experienced professionals. Our tryHRIS HR Advisors, one click compliance Handbook ,Compliance Database, HR Tools and Employee Training are ready to help navigate HR all year long. All for less than a latte a day.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

Previous Labor Laws & Information

Federal Labor Laws (2019 Updates)

The end of the year is here and for those of you trying to play catch up with compliance, we’ve compiled a complete list of all Federal Labor Law updates for 2019. 

Law Training for Employees and Supervisors

We make sure catching up is never on your to-do list. tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which alerts you when Federal & State laws, regulations or requirements change, keeping you informed.

Employment Law Updates (Highlights of 2019)

Employment law saw so many changes in 2019, here are a few of the highlights to take a closer look at. 

Final 2020 W-4 Released

On December 5, 2019, the Internal Revenue Service released a final Form W-4 for use in 2020. Employees complete the Form W-4 so that their employers can withhold the correct federal tax from their paycheck. A significant change for the 2020 form is that it does not have withholding allowances because employees may no longer claim personal exemptions or dependency exemptions. Previously, the value of a withholding allowance was tied to the amount of the personal exemption.

Read what this means for employers and download the final W-4 2020 Form.

IRS Draft Forms

In November and December 2019, the Internal Revenue Service released the following draft tax forms for 2019:

    • ●  Form 1095-B, Health Coverage.

    • ●  Inst 1094-C and 1095-C, Instructions for Forms 1094-C and 1095-C.

    • ●  Form 1095-C, Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage.

    • ●  Inst 1094-B and 1095-B, Instructions for Forms 1094-B and 1095-B.

      These are early release drafts of IRS tax forms, instructions, and publications that the IRS provides to the public. These draft forms may not be filed or relied upon for filing. Although the IRS generally does not release draft forms until it believes it has incorporated all changes, sometimes unexpected issues arise or legislation is passed, requiring modifications. In addition, forms generally are subject to the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s approval before their official release, and drafts of instructions and publications usually have some changes before their final release. These early release drafts are on the IRS draft tax forms page and may remain there even after the finals are posted on the IRS final release forms page.

      See the IRS draft tax forms page and final release forms page.

Sexual Harassment Prevention Training Requirements

16 States and Districts have now required or have made official comments regarding required Harassment Training. 

Sexual & Discrimination Harassment Prevention Requirements continue to sweep the nation in 2020, heres the list of 2019’s States and their specific requirements

AB5 California Compliance - An Assembly Bill to Watch in 2020.

In September 2019, California passed an unprecedented bill that defines employee classification on a new level, complete with fines for misclassification. Though this is specific to California, Assembly Bill 5 is likely to continue legislation in additional states and is certainly one to watch in the coming year.

Read what AB5 Compliance means for Employers in California and how it will affect you if the Bill passes in your state. 

National Safety Council and Cannabis Impairment Statement Issued

On October 22, 2019, the National Safety Council (NSC) released a position/policy statement addressing cannabis impairment in safety sensitive positions and the NSC position that it is unsafe to be under the influence of cannabis while working in a safety sensitive position due to the increased risk of injury or death to the operator and others. Moreover, the NSC believes there is no level of cannabis use that is safe or acceptable for employees who work in safety sensitive positions.

The NSC is “a nonprofit organization with the mission of eliminating preventable deaths at work . . . through leadership, research, education and advocacy.”

Read the statement.

Download the State Marijuana Law Chart for more information about your state’s requirements. 

HIPAA Penalties Updated

On April 30, 2019, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a Notification of Enforcement Discretion Regarding HIPAA Civil Money Penalties (Document No. 2019-08530) in the Federal Register to inform the public that it will apply a different cumulative annual civil money penalties limit for each of the four penalty tiers in the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009. The HITECH Act established four categories for HIPAA violations:

  • No Knowledge (of a violation). 
  • Reasonable Cause (was the reason for the violation and not willful neglect).
  • Willful Neglect — Corrected (willful neglect was the cause the violation and it was corrected within 30 days).
  • Willful Neglect — Not Corrected (willful neglect was the cause of the violation and it was not corrected within 30 days — not timely).

The amended penalties are as follows:

  • No Knowledge:
    • Minimum Penalty/Violation: $100
    • Maximum Penalty/Violation: $50,000
    • Annual Limit: $25,000
  • Reasonable Cause:
    • Minimum Penalty/Violation: $1,000
    • Maximum Penalty/Violation: $50,000
    • Annual Limit: $100,000
  • Willful Neglect — Corrected:
    • Minimum Penalty/Violation: $10,000
    • Maximum Penalty/Violation: $50,000
    • Annual Limit: $250,000
  • Willful Neglect — Not Corrected:
    • Minimum Penalty/Violation: $50,000
    • Maximum Penalty/Violation: $50,000
    • Annual Limit: $1,500,000

The penalties became effective April 30, 2019.

Read the Federal Register.

If these law alerts have you a bit overwhelmed and you find you have more questions than answers, our advisors can help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to see how we can help streamline HR for professionals or office managers.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

2019 Federal Labor Law Changes: October

Federal Employment laws saw five updates this past September. These employment law updates include:

  1. National Safety Council and Cannabis Impairment.
  2. SSA Contribution and Benefit Base.
  3. DOL proposed Rule for FLSA Tip Provisions.
  4. EEOC Data Collection Deadline Extension. 
  5. DOL Overtime Update.

Download Law Alerts for Future Reference

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which alerts you to all Federal & your selected State(s) law, regulation & requirement changes.

Federal Labor Law Update 1:

National Safety Council and Cannabis Impairment

The NSC supports policies to mitigate and eliminate the risks of Cannabis due to safety concerns as legalization and decriminalization continues. 

On October 22, 2019, the National Safety Council (NSC) released a position/policy statement addressing cannabis impairment in safety sensitive positions and the NSC position that it is unsafe to be under the influence of cannabis while working in a safety sensitive position due to the increased risk of injury or death to the operator and others. Moreover, the NSC believes there is no level of cannabis use that is safe or acceptable for employees who work in safety sensitive positions.

The NSC is “a nonprofit organization with the mission of eliminating preventable deaths at work . . . through leadership, research, education and advocacy.”

Read the NSC Official Statement

Here’s a helpful HR Tool from our Compliance Database.

Federal Labor Law Update 2:

Social Security Administration Contribution and Benefit Base

The contribution annual limit base amount increased $4,800 to $137,700 for 2020. 

On October 10, 2019, the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) announced that the 2020 Social Security wage base will be $137,700, an increase of $4,800 from the 2019 wage base of $132,900.

The SSA’s Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program limits the amount of earnings subject to taxation for a given year. The OASDI tax rate for wages paid in 2020 is set by statute at 6.2 percent each for employees and employers. Thus, an individual with wages equal to or more than $137,700 would contribute $8,537.40 to the OASDI program in 2020, and their employer would contribute the same amount. The OASDI tax rate for self-employment income in 2020 is 12.4 percent.

These rates are effective January 1, 2020. Read the Official Announcement. 

SSA Contribution and Benefit Chart

Federal Labor Law Update 3:

Department of Labor Proposed Rule for FLSA Tip Provisions

FLSA allows an employer that meets certain requirements to count a limited amount of the tips its “tipped employees” receive as a credit toward its Federal minimum wage obligation (known as a “tip credit”).

On October 7, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for tip provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) implementing provisions of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018 (CAA) and codifying existing Wage and Hour Division (WHD) guidance into a rule.

The CAA prohibits employers from keeping employees’ tips. The NPRM would allow employers who do not take a tip credit to establish a tip pool to be shared between workers who receive tips and are paid the full minimum wage and employees that do not traditionally receive tips, such as dishwashers and cooks.

The proposed rule would not impact regulations providing that employers who take a tip credit may only have a tip pool among traditionally tipped employees. An employer may take a tip credit toward its minimum wage obligation for tipped employees equal to the difference between the required cash wage (currently $2.13 per hour) and the federal minimum wage. Establishments utilizing a tip credit may only have a tip pool among traditionally tipped employees.

Additionally, under the proposed rule an employer may take a tip credit for any amount of time an employee in a tipped occupation performs related non-tipped duties with tipped duties. For the employer to use the tip credit, the employee must perform non-tipped duties contemporaneous with, or within a reasonable time immediately before or after, performing the tipped duties. The proposed regulation also addresses which non-tipped duties are related to a tip-producing occupation.

The proposed rule would also:

  • Explicitly prohibit employers, managers, and supervisors from keeping tips received by employees;
  • Remove regulatory language imposing restrictions on an employer’s use of tips when the employer does not take a tip credit. This would allow employers that do not take an FLSA tip credit to include a broader group of workers, such as cooks or dishwashers, in a mandatory tip pool.
  • Incorporate in the regulations, as provided under the CAA, new civil money penalties, currently up to $1,100, that may be imposed when employers unlawfully keep tips.
  • Amend the regulations so that an employer may take a tip credit for any amount of time that an employee in a tipped occupation performs related non-tipped duties at the same time as his or her tipped duties, or for a reasonable time immediately before or after performing the tipped duties.
  • Withdraw the DOL’s NPRM, published on December 5, 2017, that proposed changes to tip regulations as that NPRM was superseded by the CAA.

The NPRM will be available for review and public comment for 60 days. The DOL’s current NPRM publishes on October 8, 2019. Read the Official Overview.

Federal Labor Law Update 4:

EEO-1 Component Two Deadline Extended

The National Labor Relations Board adopted the ‘Contract coverage’ standard to replace the previous ‘clear and unmistakable waiver’ standard. 

As ordered by the court’s decision in National Women’s Law Center, et al., v. Office of Management and Budget, et al., Civil Action No. 17-cv-2458 (D.D.C.), EEO-1 filers were required to submit Component 2 data for calendar year 2017, in addition to Component 2 data for calendar year 2018, by September 30, 2019. However, in a September 27, 2019 Status Report that was filed in the lawsuit discussing post-September 30th activities, the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) stated that so long as the court’s order is in effect stating that the collection will not be complete until it reaches what the court has determined to be the target response rate, the EEOC will continue to accept Component 2 data for 2017 and 2018. Subsequently, Component 2 data for 2017 and 2018 will be accepted beyond the original deadline of September 30, 2019. Read about the deadline extension. 

Federal Labor Law Change 5:

Department of Labor Overtime Update

The department of Labor Announced a final rule regarding overtime pay regarding the earning thresholds and allows employers to count a portion of bonus/commission towards meeting salary levels. 

On September 24, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor announced a final rule regarding overtime pay. The ruling updates the earnings thresholds necessary to exempt executive, administrative, and professional employees from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s minimum wage and overtime pay requirements, and also allows employers to count a portion of certain bonuses/commissions toward meeting the salary level.

In the final rule:

  • The “standard salary level” increases from $455 per week to $684 per week (equivalent to $35,568 per year for a full-year worker);
  • The total annual compensation requirement for “highly compensated employees” increases from $100,000 per year to $107,432 per year;
  • Employers may use nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments (including commissions) paid at least annually to satisfy up to 10 percent of the standard salary level; and
  • The special salary levels for workers in U.S. territories and the motion picture industry was revised.

The final rule is effective on January 1, 2020.

Read the official final rule.

Here’s a helpful HR Tool from our Compliance Database.

If you have questions about how these federal law changes affect your business, our advisors can help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to see how we can help streamline HR for professionals or office managers.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

Texas Employment Law 2019: October

Texas State Labor Law had one update in October 2019 specific to San Antonio.

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which alerts you to all Federal & your selected State(s) law, regulation & requirement changes.

Texas State Labor Laws: 2019 Updates

Download Law Alerts for Future Reference

Texas Employment Law Update:

San Antonio Revises Sick and Safe Leave Ordinance

City specific revisions from the San Antonio City Council. 

In October 2019, the San Antonio City Council approved the following revisions to the city’s sick and safe leave ordinance:

  • Identifies the leave as sick and safe time (previously categorized as earned paid sick and safe leave) and clarifies that leave is a fringe benefit, not a wage or salary component.
  • Redefines covered employees and no longer requires an employee to have worked 80 hours in a year.
  • Includes a worker who is typically based outside of the city (the employee works outside the geographical boundaries of the city of San Antonio for more than 50 percent of work hours in a year) and performs work in the city on an occasional basis as a covered employee under the ordinance if they perform more than 240 hours of work in the city within a year.
  • Expands the definition of family member to include domestic partners and same-sex significant others, household members, and more. The revisions also liberally interpret the concept of parenthood.
  • The accrual rate is modified to permit employees to accrue one hour of paid sick and safe leave for every 30 hours worked with a baseline amount of up to 56 hours per year.
  • Payment of accrued leave is not required upon separation or rehire and may not be calculated as an increase to salary or wages for an employee.
  • Modifies usage requirements by providing that an established eligibility period may not exceed 90 days from the start of employment to when the leave may be used.

The revisions also modify the following:

  • Repercussions for abuse of sick and safe leave;
  • Confidentiality and nondisclosure terms;
  • When an employer provides a more generous policy;
  • Notice, recordkeeping, and signage requirements; and
  • Enforcement, violations, and penalties.

The ordinance continues to be effective until December 1, 2019. See the revisions here

Here’s a helpful HR Tool from our Compliance Database.

Our advisors help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to learn how we can help streamline HR for professionals or office managers.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

New York Labor Law 2019: October

New York Labor Law had two updates to legislation this month. These include the expansion of the Human Rights Law Coverage and New Human Rights Guidance to the NYCHRL. 

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which alerts you to all Federal & State law, regulation & requirement changes.

New York Employment Law Updates

New York Labor Law Update 1:

NYC Human Rights Law Coverage Expanded

This legislation further defines coverage specifications.

On October 13, 2019, the New York City Council enacted legislation Int. No. 136-A to amend the city’s Human Rights Law to clarify the following:

  • Covered employers do not include those with fewer than four employees at all times during the period beginning twelve months before the start of an unlawful discriminatory practice and continuing through the end of it. Additionally, an employer’s parent, spouse, domestic partner or child working for are included in determining employee count only, not for legal governance.
  • Covered employees include all the following:
    • Independent contractors.
    • Interns and freelancers.

The law is effective January 11, 2020.

New York Labor Law Update 2:

New York City Commission Provides New Human Rights Guidance

New legal enforcement guidance on the Human Rights Law protecting against discrimination. 

In September 2019, the New York City Commission on Human Rights released new legal enforcement guidance on the New York City Human Rights Law’s (NYCHRL) protections against discrimination based on actual or perceived immigration status and actual or perceived national origin. The NYCHRL prohibits discrimination on the basis of actual or perceived alienage and citizenship status, and national origin, among other categories by most employers in New York City.

If these law alerts give you more questions than answers, our advisors can help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to see how we can help streamline HR for professionals or office managers.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

California Labor Laws 2019: October

There have been several changes to California Labor Laws this October. These include:

  • Six city updates to California Minimum Wage.
  • Eleven Worker Protection Bills
  • Five Consumer Privacy Act Amendments
  • Seven additional employment law updates, legislation and assembly bills including updates to: AB5, Wage Payments, Leave of Absence, Data Breeches, Settlement Agreements and more. 
Map of USA Businesses for HRIS System Cost

Download the PDF of California Employment Law Update for Future Reference

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which keeps you updated when all Federal & State laws, regulations & requirements change.

California Employment Law Update 1:

6 City Specific Minimum Wage Increases & Official Posters

Six Cities in California have updated their minimum wage beginning January 1, 2020.  

San Diego Minimum Wage Update:

On September 26, 2019, the City of San Diego Treasurer announced that the city’s minimum wage rate will increase to $13 per hour effective January 1, 2020. All employers must pay each employee no less than the minimum wage for each hour worked within the geographic boundaries of the city. Employers must post the city’s official minimum wage notice where employees can easily see it. Failure to post it subjects employers to penalties. Download San Diego’s Official Wage Poster.

San Jose Minimum Wage Update:

In September 2019, the San Jose Office of the City Manager announced that the city’s minimum wage will increase to $15.25 per hour effective January 1, 2020. Employers are required to pay their employees a minimum hourly wage for work performed within the City of San José. Download San Jose’s Official Wage Poster.

El Cerrito Minimum Wage Update:

Beginning January 1, 2020, an employee who performs at least two hours of work in a particular workweek within the geographic limits of the City of El Cerrito must be paid no less than $15.37 per hour. This minimum wage rate applies equally to all employees, regardless of employer size. Download El Cerrito Official Wage Poster.

Mountain View Minimum Wage Update:

Beginning January 1, 2020, employers that are subject to the Mountain View Business License Tax or that maintain a facility in Mountain View must pay each employee who performs at least two hours of work per week in Mountain View, minimum wages of no less than $16.05 per hour. The minimum wage requirement applies to adult and minor employees who work two or more hours per week (tips not included). Download Mountain View’s Official Wage Poster.

Redwood City Minimum Wage Update:

In September 2019, the Redwood City Manager announced the city’s local minimum wage rate increases to $15.38 per hour effective on January 1, 2020. All businesses operating within the geographic boundaries of the city are required to pay at least the minimum wage rate for all employees working two or more hours per week. Download Redwood City’s Official Wage Poster.

San Mateo Minimum Wage Update:

Starting January 1, 2020, the minimum wage for the City of San Mateo will increase to $15.38 per hour for all employees. Employers are required to post the city’s official notice where employees may easily read it. Failure to post this notice subjects employers to penalties. Download San Mateo’s Official Wage Poster.

Here’s a helpful HR Tool from our Compliance Database.

California Employment Law Update 2:

California Consumer Privacy Act Amendments

The following Assembly Bills clarifies personal information, opt outs, business websites and authorizations.  

On October 11, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the following five bills that amend the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA):

  1. CA A.B. 25: Authorizes businesses to require authentication of a consumer if it is reasonable, in light of the nature of the personal information requested, in order to make a verifiable consumer request; authorizes a consumer to bring a private civil action against a business that violates its duty to implement reasonable security procedures and practices, if that failure results in a consumer’s personal information being subject to unauthorized access and exfiltration, or theft; and until January 1, 2021, provides businesses with exemptions from the CCPA for personal information that is collected from applicants (employee and human resources information) for employment, emergency contact information, and information that is necessary for the business to retain to administer workplace.
  2. CA A.B. 874: Clarifies that personal information under the CCPA does not include publicly available information, which is information that is lawfully made available from federal, state, or local government records but is not biometric information collected by a business about a consumer without the consumer’s knowledge. Also clarifies that personal information under the act does not include consumer information that is deidentified or aggregate consumer information.
  3. CA A.B. 1146: Excepts from the CCPA the right to opt out vehicle information or ownership information retained or shared between a new motor vehicle dealer and the vehicle’s manufacturer, if the information is shared for vehicle repair that is covered by a vehicle warranty or a recall.
  4. CA A.B. 1355: Until January 1, 2021, the law provides a business-to-business exemption for personal information a business collects about an employee, owner, director, officer, or contractor of a business when collected as part of business-to-business transactions; consumers may institute a civil action when non-encrypted and non-redacted personal information is subject to unauthorized access; consumer reporting agencies have an exemption for the collection, maintenance, disclosure, sale, communication, or use of personal information covered by the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act.
  5. CA A.B. 1564: Exclusively-online businesses with a direct relationship with a consumer from whom they collect personal information are only required to provide an email address for submitting requests for information required to be disclosed; if the business maintains a website, then the website must be available to consumers to submit requests for information that the business is required to disclose.

These laws are effective January 1, 2020

California Employment Law Update 3:

Settlement Agreements

New legislation regarding restrictions of settlement agreements.

On October 12, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the A.B. 749 legislation regarding settlement agreements. Specifically, the law states that an agreement to settle an employment dispute may not contain a provision prohibiting, preventing, or otherwise restricting a settling party that is an aggrieved person from obtaining future employment with the employer against which the aggrieved person has filed a claim, or any parent company, subsidiary, division, affiliate, or contractor of the employer. A provision in an agreement entered into on or after January 1, 2020 that violates this law is void as a matter of law and against public policy.

However, the law does not:

  • Preclude the employer and aggrieved person from making an agreement to end a current employment relationship or prohibit or otherwise restrict the settling aggrieved person from obtaining future employment with the settling employer, if the employer has made a good faith determination that the person engaged in sexual harassment or sexual assault; or
  • Require an employer to continue to employ or rehire a person if there is a legitimate nondiscriminatory or nonretaliatory reason for terminating the employment relationship or refusing to rehire the person.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

California Employment Law Update 4:

Arbitration Fees

The National Labor Relations Board adopted the ‘Contract coverage’ standard to replace the previous ‘clear and unmistakable waiver’ standard. 

On October 13, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation S.B. 707 regarding an employer’s failure to pay arbitration costs. Generally, under the law, an employer’s failure to pay arbitration fees under an employer-imposed mandatory arbitration agreement is a breach, waives the agreement, and the non-breaching party may bring a claim in court.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

California Employment Law Update 5:

Gun Violence Restraining Orders

This legislation allows co-workers or employers to file a specific employment restraining order prohibiting the subject’s legal access to guns due to them displaying a potential and significant danger.

On October 11, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation A.B. 61 allowing an employer or a co-worker to file a petition requesting that a court issue a gun violence restraining order prohibiting the subject of the petition (subject) from having in their custody or control, owning, purchasing, possessing, or receiving a firearm or ammunition for one to five years because:

  • The subject poses a significant danger, in the near future, of causing personal injury to themselves or another by having firearm; and
  • The restraining order is necessary to prevent personal injury to the subject or another because less restrictive alternatives either have been tried and found to be ineffective or are inadequate or inappropriate for the circumstances.

For a co-worker to apply for the restraining order they must have substantial and regular interactions with the subject for at least one year and also have received the employer’s approval to file the petition. An employer or co-worker may also request renewal of the restraining order three months prior to its expiration.

The law is effective January 1, 2020 and is operative September 1, 2020

California Employment Law Update 6:

Personal Information and Data Breaches

This legislation clarifies the definition of personal information under data breach provisions. 

On October 11, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation A.B. 1130 clarifying the definition of personal information under the state’s data breach provisions to include:

  • A driver’s license number, California identification card number, tax identification number, passport number, military identification number, or other unique identification number issued on a government document commonly used to verify the identity of a specific individual; and
  • Unique biometric data generated from measurements or technical analysis of human body characteristics, such as a fingerprint, retina, or iris image, used to authenticate a specific individual. However, unique biometric data does not include a physical or digital photograph, unless used or stored for facial recognition purposes.

Additionally, under the law, in a business’s security breach notification where the breach involves biometric data, the notice may include instructions on how to notify other entities that use the same type of biometric data (that was subject to breach) as an authenticator to no longer rely on it for authentication purposes.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

California Employment Law Update 7:

Worker Protection Bills

These bills address sexual harassment, wage and health protections for California’s workforce. 

On October 10, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the following bills aimed at increasing protections for California’s workforce, which includes legislation drafted in response to the #MeToo movement focused on sexual harassment prevention and accountability:

These bills are effective January 1, 2020.

California Employment Law Update 8:

AB5 Amendment

This legislation amends the Assembly Bill 5 regarding worker classification exemptions. 

On October 2, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation A.B. 170 exempting both of the following from the Dynamex/California Assembly Bill 5 independent contractor provisions:

  • A newspaper distributor working under contract with a newspaper publisher; and
  • A newspaper carrier working under contract, either with a newspaper publisher or newspaper distributor.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

California Employment Law Update 9:

Additional Leave of Absence Requirement for Living Organ Donators.

This legislation requires employers to provide a leave of absence for employees choosing to become a living tissue donor. 

On September 20, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation A.B. 1223 modifying Cal. Lab. Code Ann. § 1510 and requiring private employers to provide leave of absences to:

An employee who is an organ donor, leave as follows:

  • Paid leave of absence for up to 30 business days in a one-year period to donate an organ to another person; and
  • Additional, unpaid leave of absence for up to 30 business days in a one-year period for the organ donation.

An employee who is a bone marrow donor, up to five business days in a one-year period to donate bone marrow to another person.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

California Employment Law Update 10:

Print Shoot Employees and Wage Payment

This legislation enacts new laws for print shoot employees and their wage payment. 

On September 5, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the legislation  S.B. 671 enacting new laws for print shoot employees and their wage payment. A print shoot employee is hired for a limited time and supports a still image shoot, including film or digital photography, for use in print, digital, or internet media. Under the law:

  • Upon termination, print shoot employees are entitled to receive wages earned but not yet paid by the next regular payday that is an employer-designated day for wage payment during the payroll period when termination occurred.
  • Wages may be mailed to the employee or provided at a location as specified by the employer in the county where the employee was hired or performed labor.
  • Payment is deemed as made on the date wages are mailed or the date when provided at the employer-determined location, whichever is earlier.

 The law took effect September 5, 2019.

If these law alerts have you a bit overwhelmed and you find you have more questions than answers, our advisors can help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to see how we can help streamline HR for professionals or office managers.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

Federal Employment Law Updates | September 2019

Federal Employment laws saw four updates this past September. These employment law updates include:

  1. Federal Minimum wage increase for Federal Contractors.
  2. New DOL Opinion letters regarding the FMLA, FLSA and CCPA.
  3. Changes to the EEOC Data Collection requirements.
  4. The NLRB adoption of ‘Contract coverage’.
Map of USA Businesses for HRIS System Cost

Download Law Alerts for Future Reference

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which alerts you to all Federal & State law, regulation & requirement changes.

Federal Employment Law Update 1:

Federal Contractor Minimum Wage Increase

This raises the minimum wage for federal contract workers beginning January 1, 2020.

On September 19, 2019, the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor published a notice in the Federal Register announcing the applicable minimum wage rate for workers performing work on or in connection with federal contracts covered by Executive Order 13658, Establishing a Minimum Wage for Contractors. Beginning January 1, 2020, the minimum wage rate applicable to workers performing work on or in connection with covered contracts increases to $10.80 per hour, and the required minimum cash wage applicable to tipped employees performing work on or in connection with covered contracts increases to $7.55 per hour.

Read the notice.

Here’s a helpful HR Tool from our Compliance Database.

Federal Employment Law Update 2:

EEOC will not seek renewal of Component 2 Data Collection

The EEOC will not seek renewal for Component 2 Data due to the benefit being ‘far outweighed by the burden imposed on employers’ that must comply with the reporting obligation.

On September 12, 2019, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is scheduled to publish in the Federal Register an announcement that it does not intent to submit to a request to renew Component 2 data collection. The EEOC has determined that the burden-estimate associated with the EEO-1 is higher than it has previously estimated.

According to the unpublished notice, “The Commission now concludes that it should consider information from the ongoing Component 2 data collection before deciding whether to submit a pay data collection [request going forward]. At this point in time, the unproven utility to its enforcement program of the pay data as defined in the 2016 Component 2 is far outweighed by the burden imposed on employers that must comply with the reporting obligation. Therefore, the EEOC is not seeking to renew Component 2 of the EEO-1.” The EEO-1 Component 2 collections for 2017 and 2018 are currently underway and are due September 30, 2019. 

Desipte the higher burden, the EEOC still intends to continue its collection of Component 1 data because it “is necessary for the proper performance of the agency’s functions and has a practical utility to the fulfillment of the EEOC’s mission.”

Read the Unpublished Document.

Federal Employment Law Update 3:

DOL Releases Opinion Letters

Three opinion letters to help businesses navigate the compliance issues of the FMLA, the FLSA and the CCPA. 

On September 10, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced three new opinion letters that address compliance issues related to the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), and the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (CCPA) as follows:

  • FMLA2019-3-A: Addressing whether an employer may delay designating paid leave as FMLA leave due to a collective-bargaining agreement;
  • FLSA2019-13: Addressing the ordinary meaning of the phrase “not less than one month” for purposes of FLSA § 7(i)’s representative period requirement; and
  • CCPA2019-1: Addressing whether employers’ contributions to employees’ health savings accounts are earnings under the CCPA. 

Read the announcement

Federal Employment Law Update 4:

NLRB Adopts Contract Coverage Standard

The National Labor Relations Board adopted the ‘Contract coverage’ standard to replace the previous ‘clear and unmistakable waiver’ standard. 

On September 10, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released its decision in M.V. Transportation, Inc. (28-CA-173726; 368 NLRB No. 66) where it adopted the “contract coverage” standard for determining whether a unionized employer’s unilateral change in a term or condition of employment violates the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). This decision replaces the former “clear and unmistakable waiver” standard, where the NLRB would find that an employer’s unilateral change violated the act unless a contractual provision unequivocally and specifically referred to the type of employer action at issue.

Under the “contract coverage” standard, the NLRB examines the language of the parties’ collective-bargaining agreement to determine whether the change made by the employer was within the compass or scope of contractual language granting the employer the right to act unilaterally. If it was, the NLRB honors the terms of the agreement and the employer will not have violated the act by making the change without bargaining. However, if the agreement does not cover the employer’s disputed action, then employer is in violation of the act unless it can demonstrate either:

  • The union waived its right to bargain over the change; or
  • The employer was privileged to act unilaterally for some other reason.  

Read the decision.

If these law alerts have you a bit overwhelmed and you find you have more questions than answers, our advisors can help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to see how we can help streamline HR for professionals or office managers.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

What AB5 Compliance Means for California Employers

October 2019: Update on AB5

Regarding Independent Contractors and Newspaper Distributors​

On October 2, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation (A.B. 170) exempting both of the following from the Dynamex/California Assembly Bill 5 independent contractor provisions:

  • A newspaper distributor working under contract with a newspaper publisher; and
  • A newspaper carrier working under contract, either with a newspaper publisher or newspaper distributor.

Dynamex/California Assembly Bill 5 amended the California law by clarifying that a person providing labor or services for remuneration will be considered an employee rather than an independent contractor unless the hiring entity demonstrates that all of the following conditions are satisfied ABC Test, see below.

Read the official update: CA A.B. 170

What does AB5 Mean for California Employers?

On Wednesday, September 18th 2019 California Governor Gavin Newsome placed the final signature on the AB 5 legislation, changing the face of worker classification in California. With the fifth leading economy in the world, this reclassification affects as many as 2 Million workers; transforming them from independent contractors into employees almost overnight.

Independent contractor

This law, brought upon by the infamous Dynamex ruling, amends the California Labor Code, California Unemployment Insurance Code and the IWC wage orders. These amendments state all ‘hiring entities’ must now classify ‘all persons that provide services or labor’ as employees UNLESS that ‘hiring entity’ can demonstrate that ALL conditions of the ABC test (below) are met.

The ABC Test

  1. The person is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact;
  2. The person performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and
  3. The person is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.

What AB5 Classification Changes Mean for Employers

Though UBER, Lyft, and Grubhub have been the center focus due to the obvious and serious implications of this change to their business model, most employers are in the dark about what this could mean for them. As always, every major change regarding employment law comes with the unpreventable compliance nightmares, and AB5 will certainly be no different.

By January 1, 2020, California businesses, excluding those granted an exception (see below), will have to comply with the ABC test ruling or face a host of legal issues.

Workers now considered employees under the ABC test will be eligible for the following:

  • Minimum Wage
  • Overtime Pay
  • Meal and Break Rest
  • Worker’s Compensation Coverage
  • Unemployment Insurance
  • Various Benefits
  • Paid Sick Leave
  • State Family Leave (PDL, FMLA/CFRA, NPLA, FEHA, PFL, STD)

 

We’re here to help with this.

Click to Download the California Leave Requirements Chart.

And, while the law takes full effect beginning January 1, 2020, the retroactive implications of AB5 mean all previous independent contractors who are now considered employee status are covered by state civil rights laws including discrimination and harassment protections. Additionally, employers have to accept the possibility of these workers forming Labor Unions.

In short, this new employment law makes it much more difficult for many companies to classify workers in California as independent contractors, while also increasing the difficulty for these businesses to hire smaller entrepreneurial businesses.

The List of Additional Business Compliance Requirements

Above and beyond the tasks of defining workers under these new classifications, come the additional requirements such as:

  • Updating your Employee Handbook to include these compliance specifications.
  • Providing State required Harassment Prevention Training to everyone now considered an employee.
  • Calculating correct Leave Requirements.
  • Calculating Wages, Break Periods and Overtime.

The Exceptions to the Ruling

Many employers in California became aware of the potentially detrimental change coming back in April 2018, with the California’s Supreme Court’s ruling to adopt the ABC test to determine independent contractor status. Certain professions were granted amnesty under the new classification requirements. 

These exceptions include:

  • Doctors
  • Dentists
  • Veterinarians
  • Lawyers
  • Architects
  • Engineers
  • Private Investigators
  • Accountants
  • Securities Broker-Dealers
  • Investment Advisors
  • Human Resource Administrators
  • Travel Agents
  • Marketers
  • Graphic Designers
  • Grant Writers
  • Fine Artists
  • Certain Photographers or Photo Journalists
  • Certain Freelance Writers

 

Other exceptions include stipulations such as:

Commercial Fisherman are exempt for all requirements except unemployment insurance.

Estheticians, electrologists, manicurists, barbers and cosmetologists are exempt ONLY if they:

  • Set their own rates.
  • Schedule Their Own Clients and;
  • Follow several other requirements specific to independent contractors rather than employees (as per the ABC test.)

Salespersons are exempt only if their pay is based on actual sales as opposed to wholesale purchases or referrals.

Though this exemption list may continue to grow with future legislation, businesses in California must adjust to AB5 Compliance quickly. And our services can make this transition as easy as possible.

Services We Offer that Expedite California AB5 Compliance

We understand how major changes in employment law effect businesses, leaving them wondering where to turn for the right answers. The services we’re offering to small businesses nationwide will now benefit California employers in unprecedented ways. These specific services include:

These 25 Credentialed HR Advisors have extensive knowledge of California Employment compliance. They are available by phone, chat or email from 6:00 AM to 5:00 PM PST. Turn to them with all your AB 5 compliance questions, as well as other tough HR questions that arise.

Complete with Federal, State and Industry specific, ERISA Attorney Written Content; our Handbook alerts you to every compliance change in real time, providing self-updated attorney written content for your approval. One click and you remain compliant with every change. Automatic Updates are included for 1 year and can be renewed. Multi-State and Spanish translation are also available at an additional cost.

Or included with our Complete TrainingUnlimited Supervisor Participants for one low cost. This online training comes on a digital progress tracking dashboard and can be offered individually or completed in a group setting. Satisfies Ab1825/SB 1343 requirements. Spanish Version also available. Harassment Prevention Training for Employees available for additional cost.

Available Only With Complete Package

A private ‘search engine feature’ built specifically for regulatory compliance. Updated Daily. Provides access to state law alerts, regulation and legislation changes, white papers, checklists, forms, sample policies, toolkits and invaluable HR tools including:

  1. Employee Classification Tool
  2. State Law Comparison Tool
  3. Compliance Calendar
  4. Job Description Builder
  5. Salary Calculator
  6. Performance Review Tools
  7. Vast Webinar Library (Recertification Webinars)

$995/Year or $99/Month

Includes everything above and:

  1. 300+ Certified Training Courses for Unlimited Employees (see Catalog)
  2. Pop Document Builder
  3. Wrap Document Builder
  4. Custom Training Program Expertly Built for Your Needs
  5. 14-Day Money Back Guarantee*

 

We’re here to help you manage risk and liability easily, so you can get back to what you do best.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

*14-Day Money Back Guarantee Stipulations

Money Back Guarantee valid for Membership accounts 14 days from date of purchase. Guarantee voided with completion of Employee Handbook, Employee Training Course or Benefit Documents (POP/WRAP).

Illinois Employment Law Updates: September 2019

Illinois Governor Pritzker amended the Personal Information Protection Act to include a mandatory notice of any and all breaches to be reported to the Attorney General. 

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which alerts you the moment State and Federal employment laws, regulations or requirements change.

chicago IL Employment Law Alerts

Employment Law Update: Personal Information Protection Act Amended

This law, amended in August, is effective as of January 1, 2020.

On August 9, 2019, Governor J.B. Pritzker signed legislation (S.B. 1624) amending Illinois’ Personal Information Protection Act to require data collectors that are required to issue data breach notices to more than 500 Illinois residents, as a result of a single security breach, to also provide notice to the Illinois Attorney General (AG) that contains:

  • A description of the nature of the breach, unauthorized acquisition, or use;
  • The number of Illinois residents affected by the incident at the time of notification; and
  • Any steps the data collector has taken, or plans to take, related to the incident.

Notice to the AG must be completed in the most expedient time possible, without unreasonable delay, and no later than when notice is provided to consumers. If the date of the breach is unknown when the notice is sent to the AG, then the data collector must send it as soon as possible. Upon receipt of the notice, the AG may publish the name of the data collector that suffered the breach, the types of personal information compromised, and its date range.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

Read IL S.B. 1624

Who will be affected by this IL PIPA amendment?

Any Illinois institution who “handles, collects, disseminates, or otherwise deals with nonpublic personal information” is considered a data collector and is directly affected by this amendment.

What constitutes "Personal Data"?

“Personal data” is defined as an individual’s first name (or initial) and last name, in combination with any one or more of the following:

  • Driver’s license number or State identification card number
  • Social security number
  • Account number or credit or debit card number
  • An account number or credit card number in combination with any security code, access code or password that would allow access to an individual’s financial properties.

If you have questions about this employment law update, our advisors can help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to see how we can help streamline HR.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature

Previous Illinois Law Alerts FOR EMPLOYERS

California Law Alerts: September 2019

On September 18, 2019 California Governor Newsome signed final legislation for AB 5, drastically altering worker classification compliance. See official law alert below or Read How AB5 Compliance Affects CA Employers

On August 30, 2019 the California Fair Employment and Housing Act was amended to extend the Sexual Harassment Training deadline by one year. (S. B. 778)

Additionally, the Pregnancy Leave Brochure was updated to include new rights and obligations included in the New Parent Leave Act. 

California Law Alerts for September 2019

tryHRIS’s membership includes the Regulatory Compliance Database, which alerts you the moment Federal & State laws, regulations or requirements change, keeping you informed.

Law Alert 3: Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5) Redefines Worker Classification

The new legislation amends the California Labor Code, the California Unemployment Insurance Code, and for the Industrial Welfare Commission’s wage orders, to define a person providing labor or services for remuneration as an employee rather than an independent contractor unless the hiring entity demonstrates that all of the following conditions are satisfied for the ABC Test.

On September 18, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation (A.B. 5) codifying the California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. V. Superior Court of Los Angeles, where the court “cited the harm to misclassified workers who lose significant workplace protections, the unfairness to employers who must compete with companies that misclassify, and the loss to the state of needed revenue from companies that use misclassification to avoid obligations such as payment of payroll taxes, payment of premiums for workers’ compensation, Social Security, unemployment, and disability insurance.”

Specifically, the law amends the California Labor Code, the California Unemployment Insurance Code, and for the Industrial Welfare Commission’s wage orders (IWC wage orders), a person providing labor or services for remuneration will be considered an employee rather than an independent contractor unless the hiring entity demonstrates that all of the following conditions are satisfied (ABC Test):

  1. The person is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact;
  2. The person performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and
  3. The person is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.

The law clarifies:

  • Any exceptions to the terms “employee,” “employer,” “employ,” or “independent contractor,” and any extensions of employer status or liability, that are expressly made by a provision of the Labor Code, the Unemployment Insurance Code, or in an applicable IWC wage order, including, but not limited to, the definition of “employee” in subdivision 2(E) of Wage Order No. 2, remain in effect.
  • That it does not apply to the following occupations, and instead, the determination of employee or independent contractor status for individuals in those occupations is governed by Borello (a multi-factor test):
    • A person or organization who is licensed by the California Department of Insurance pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 1621 – insurance agents), Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 1760 – surplus line brokers), or Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 1831 – life and disability insurance analysts) of Part 2 of Division 1 of the Insurance Code.
    • A licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, podiatrist, psychologist, or veterinarian performing professional or medical services provided to or by a health care entity.
    • A licensed, practicing lawyer, architect, engineer, private investigator, or accountant.
    • A securities broker-dealer or investment adviser or their agents and representatives that are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or licensed by the State of California.
    • A direct sales salesperson.
    • A commercial fisherman working on an American vessel. 
  • That the holding in Dynamex does not apply to a contract for professional services, defined within the law, and instead the determination of whether the individual is an employee or independent contractor is governed by Borello if the hiring entity demonstrates that all of the following factors are satisfied:
    • The individual maintains a business location, which may include the individual’s residence, that is separate from the hiring entity. However, individual may choose to perform services at the location of the hiring entity.
    • If work is performed more than six months after the effective date of the law, the individual has a business license, in addition to any required professional licenses or permits for the individual to practice in their profession.
    • The individual has the ability to set or negotiate their own rates for the services performed.
    • Outside of project completion dates and reasonable business hours, the individual has the ability to set their own hours.
    • The individual is customarily engaged in the same type of work performed under contract with another hiring entity or holds themselves out to other potential customers as available to perform the same type of work.
    • The individual customarily and regularly exercises discretion and independent judgment in the performance of the services.

Moreover, the law and Dynamex do not apply to:

  • Specific occupations subject to the state’s Business and Professions Code (real estate licensee and repossession agency);
  • A bona fide business-to-business contracting relationship under specific conditions;
  • The relationship between a contractor and an individual performing work pursuant to a subcontract in the construction industry;
  • The relationship between a referral agency and a service provider under specific conditions; and
  • The relationship between a motor club with certificate of authority and an individual performing services pursuant to a contract between the motor club and a third party to provide motor club services utilizing the employees and vehicles of the third party.

The law also states that an action for injunctive relief to prevent the continued misclassification of employees as independent contractors may be prosecuted against the employer in court, in addition to any other remedies available.

The law is effective January 1, 2020.

Read the governor’s signing message and CA A.B. 5

Law Alert 2: Sexual Harassment Training Requirement Deadline Extended.

This legislation extends the deadline from January 2020 to January 2021 due to the outcry from the business community. Employers now have an additional 12 months to provide their Supervisors and Employees with approved sexual harassment training.  

On August 30, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation (S.B. 778) amending the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. Employers with five or more employees are required by January 1, 2021, to provide:

  • At least two hours of classroom or other effective interactive training and education regarding sexual harassment to all supervisory employees in California; and
  • At least one hour of classroom or other effective interactive training and education regarding sexual harassment to all nonsupervisory employees in California.

Thereafter, each covered employer must provide sexual harassment training and education to each employee in California once every two years. New nonsupervisory employees must be trained within six months of hire and new supervisory employees must be trained within six months of their assumption of a supervisory position.

The law also clarifies that an employer who has provided this training and education to an employee in 2019 is not required to provide refresher training and education again until two years thereafter. Additionally, beginning January 1, 2020, seasonal, temporary, or other employees that are hired to work for less than six months, must be provided sexual harassment training by their employer within 30 calendar days after hire date, or 100 hours worked — whichever is earlier.

The law took effect August 30, 2019.

Read CA S.B. 778

tryHRIS offers California Approved Sexual Harassment Training for Supervisors. $95 per course for Unlimited Supervisors. Completion Certificates included.

Law Alert 1: Pregnancy Leave Brochure Updated

In August 2019, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing updated its pregnancy leave brochure to include information about rights and obligations under the state’s New Parent Leave Act.

View New Brochure.

If you have questions regarding these or other law alerts, our advisors can help your company navigate every new change, requirement, legislation, law and regulation. Give us a call to see how we can help streamline HR for professionals or office managers.

tryhris HR Solutions guarantee and signature